How to Succeed in the Remote Work Revolution

BY Sheila Flynn | April 25, 2021

Two and a half years before Covid-19 changed the world, Harvard professor Tsedal Neeley couldn’t have seen a global pandemic coming down the road. An expert in virtual and remote work, however, she did envision a massive shift to a non-office-based workforce. By the time coronavirus upended the global economy last year, she had already amassed 300 pages of material about the future trend for her book Remote Work Revolution: Succeeding from Anywhere, which was published last month.

Despite her research and expertise, though, even Neeley–who is the Naylor Fitzhugh Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School–did not expect some of the major and subtle effects of such a sudden switch to remote work across the globe. That shift, coupled with both its positive and negative ramifications, formed the basis of a conversation between Neeley and Adi Ignatius, editor-in-chief of Harvard Business Review, at From Day One’s virtual conference last week on “Digital Tools for Building an Engaged, Productive Team.”

Along with most corporate leaders, particularly in the tech industry, Neeley and Ignatius expressed doubts that workers will ever return to previous norms, with a hybrid workplace much more likely. But HR teams and executives from CEO level down must be prepared to shepherd that long-term transition with strong leadership, frequent reassessment, and open-mindedness, Neeley said. “I am 100% convinced that, if we do this hybrid right and with courage, and we set our policies based on need and not fear, we’re preparing for the digital revolution that’s right around the corner,” Neeley said.

That means identifying and addressing even minor personal and professional changes that have been highlighted by the massive shift in corporate culture over the past year–both good and bad, she added. “Commute times have disappeared, and people’s quality of life has gotten better [through] the democratization of interactions,” Neeley said. Among other equalizers, she pointed out that on video platforms like Zoom, everyone is the same height, using herself and her husband as examples (she’s 5-foot-4; he’s a foot taller).

Author Tsedal Neeley of Harvard Business School, left, in conversation with Adi Ignatius of Harvard Business Review. You can watch the video here.

“There is this democratization that takes place ... provided we have great leaders that give everyone an opportunity to speak. Operational costs have gone down; bloated travel budgets no longer seem necessary; hiring and retaining employees without asking them to move is actually a special thing that we’ve been seeing in Boston when it comes to identifying and attracting diverse candidates,” she said. “So it’s been great to see this untapped labor pool for many companies. Astronomical real estate no longer seems important ... The numbers are staggering when we look at how many people want to retain some form of remote work in their professional arrangements.”

Those are the upsides, yet there are unintended consequences too. Ignatius asked what kinds of obstacles exist when it comes to fostering a diverse, inclusive and collaborative environment when coworkers are so physically far apart–a question many employers are grappling with. “I consider this to be the diversity and digital era,” Neeley said. “And we need to work hard to create inclusive environments so you are working together. It’s a mindset shift; you may not think you’re working together, but you are–it’s just using digital tools.”

Employers need to be intentional about the impact of these tools on all the processes of bringing people together as a team, she said. “How we onboard people, how we integrate people, how we help them build social capital ... we had heard about the weak vs. strong ties. There’s a whole set of best practices when it comes to virtual onboarding. And we have to work hard to integrate people through the systems.”

She added: “We need to pair people with others so they feel like, ‘Ah, I actually can belong here.’ Experience the place through pairing, hiring, not just one Black person or Latinx member being lonely by themselves–imagine if we brought in two people instead.”

In confronting these issues, corporate leaders need to ask themselves if there are deeper-seated organizational issues contributing to isolation that have nothing to do with remoteness. “There are all sorts of strategies–effective strategies–that companies are using in order to ensure that people don’t experience professional isolation,” Neeley said. “It’s not the distribution ... it’s your existing culture and the lack of diversity. You know, diversity begets diversity.”

Neeley's new book, published last month

While remote work becomes more established, the inclusivity efforts must also take into account employees’ diverse living situations, mental health, and personal circumstances, she said. While a vast majority of employees prefer working from home, an estimated 15% hate it, she pointed out. On top of that, even workers who had been remote for long periods of time before the pandemic had to readjust, thrown off their rhythm when the rest of their colleagues essentially joined them in a virtual daily existence. Further complicating matters is research showing that, at least before the pandemic, remote workers were often passed over for promotion in favor of on-site colleagues. And then there’s the huge existential workplace question, posed by Ignatius: “What is the point of an office at this point?”

Managers have a key role in navigating all these crosscurrents, Neeley emphasized. “We have to think differently on how to bring the group together to gel now,” she said, emphasizing the importance of feedback. “People want predictability ... and predictability around the big picture overall,” she said. “So we have to connect people to the big picture because they feel a little bit lost. They don’t know what’s happening at the mothership, so connecting people to the big picture as much as you can on a regular basis. And finally, performance feedback. Remote workers crave performance feedback. They have more questions about, ‘Am I doing okay? Are things okay?’ So we have to be so disciplined about this piece and developing people, as well.”

Both managers and employees face other pitfalls, including tech exhaustion and overwork, with Neeley and Ignatius citing previous studies showing remote workers have demonstrated higher productivity but also longer working hours. “Untrained and unchecked, remote work can go wrong,” Neeley said. “I use the term hyper-productivity when I describe productivity gone wrong. This is where our work and non-work lives get blurred to the point where we don’t know where we start and where things end because we’re literally commuting for five minutes,” she said.

“The other thing is, we’ve replaced some of our commute times with work. And on average, we’re seeing that people are working 6.8 hours more per week. If you think about seven hours, that’s like a whole day, so it’s so much more work. And leaders need to really put those guardrails up, because people are getting stressed and burned out,” Neeley said.

She added: “It’s time to recreate and revise culture–and take the best that remote work and virtuality offers, while at the same time overcoming some of the challenges. One of the most important things that I see, and the failure points that I’m worried about, is around this entire mindset shift that needs to take place. Leaders of organizations are still stuck with the idea that we’re going back to something.”

A key practice that will have to move forward is assessing and measuring performance. “How do you do that when you don’t see people?,” Neeley asked. To refocus those parameters, she said, “we need to completely rethink how we measure performance predicated on outcomes and not process. We need to trust people and help people trust people. We need to bring the logic of global organizations, even if we’re not global–which means how we think about time, how we think about space, how we think about connection, how we think about dispersion, how we think about compensation.”

Sheila Flynn is an Austin-based journalist who has written for the Associated Press, the Sunday Independent, the Irish Daily Mail and the Irish Times. She is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame.


RELATED STORIES

Empowering Your Team: How Innovative Companies Put New HR Technology to Work

Ask your nearest HR leader how many pitches they’ve gotten this week from tech vendors promising to make their jobs easier. It’s likely that your company has already shelled out serious money thanks to some of those promises, and all they’ve really gotten is another portal to manage.There’s a lot of noise in the HR tech sector, said Ardie Sameti, senior director of AI and automation at healthcare tech platform Accolade. The overload of tech tools workers are made to use at work is costing businesses time and money, and generating a lot of frustration. “Don’t get caught up in innovation, although that’s a super attractive and sexy thing. Look for practicality,” he explained during From Day One’s November virtual on how the most innovative companies are using new HR tech.Before you even evaluate a new tool or product, identify the problem it’s going to solve. You’ll be in a far better position to shop for HR tech that might actually help. Then, commit to rigorous testing. “There are a lot of free pilots out there that you can use to really measure the impact of what you’re looking at,” explained Sameti. Accolade has a sophisticated in-house process that pulls stakeholders from across the business. “Engineering, product, our HR team: Everybody’s very much involved, and we test assumptions in a very controlled manner.”When vetting new tools, senior director of HR at Sony Interactive Entertainment Ritu Shrivastav asks two questions: First, “what is the lift for the people managers?” And second, “where in the talent journey does this help me?”How HR Is Adopting Artificial IntelligenceAs long as you’re adopting new tools for specific business reasons, there are plenty of possibilities to get excited about. Within the media and entertainment industry, “there’s a leadership-advocated intentional focus on adoption of AI,” said Shrivastav at Sony, where they’ve created a bespoke artificial intelligence training program for engineers.Panelists spoke about "Empowering Your Team: How Innovative Companies Put New HR Technology to Work" (photo by From Day One)Of course, she’s quick to acknowledge reticence toward AI and its job-replacing potential. “Keep in mind that technical leaders have carefully curated their careers over several years,” Shrivastav said. “Yes, change is hard, but enhancements are loved and enhancements are easy, so keep in mind that AI is an enabler. It actually enhances your productivity and takes away a lot of that repetitive work.” Once you can get early adopters excited about the potential and evangelizing, that enthusiasm spreads.Geeta Mahindroo, global VP for finance, HR, and GBS technology at The Estée Lauder Companies, is optimistic about the potential of AI to help employees seamlessly operate the myriad different platforms that exist. “In our personal lives, we have information at our fingertips, but when we go into an organization, we have to navigate so many places to get to the information we need,” she said. Mahindroo is working on a plan to access it all more seamlessly, or what she’s calling “the employee Siri.” By prioritizing experience, she says, “we can say we treat our employees just like our customers.”Using Tech to Adapt to New Working ModelsAs career trajectories take new shapes and evolve from job-based work to skills-based work, U.S. Bank is using HR tech to help employees plan their unique future with the company. “It’s important for employees to have the tools they need to have visibility into what’s out there,” said the company’s head of employee engagement Veronika Lantseva. “What are the different roles that could be a potential next step for me, whether lateral or upward, and what are the skills for those roles? And how do I acquire them?”At Estée Lauder, Mahindroo enlisted a team of tech-savvy interns to update an old employee onboarding process. The team collected feedback from employees across the organization and at all levels, from “interns joining the company for a few weeks to people in mid-career and people who’ve been there a long time.” In just six weeks, the interns had built a prototype.Their thoroughness “gave me a lot of confidence to say, ‘if we were to take this approach and bring that insight and deploy it, it would have much better adoption within the organization because it factors in the insights from everybody,” Mahindroo explained. It was energizing for the interns and the leadership team as well, she said, “to learn how different generations think about technology, how they thought about enabling it–and how fast.”To Ensure ROI, Hold Vendors AccountableOf course, being successful requires a pragmatic, and even ruthless, commitment to numbers. Jeff Williams, CEO of benefits administrator Aptia, encouraged HR leaders to hold their vendors accountable to their pitches. “Many times I talk to clients who just don’t know where they’re at relative to their original assumptions,” he said. “Being a strategic HR leader requires us to talk in real economic terms, and not as much in narrative, to get our fellow executives invested,” he said. “And anyone who’s actually tracking their case on an ongoing basis and revisiting their ROI: They’re in the top decile of heavy HR tech implementation.”Measure your outcomes unflinchingly, and if there’s some tool collecting dust on a shelf, use it or get rid of it,” Williams said. “Drive toward success-based outcomes, not only getting the thing installed, but getting up to the adoption levels that they committed to and they were helping you with your business case.”HR leaders must be active tech evangelists, said Sony’s Shrivasta. A lot of leaders talk about why they’ve adopted some tool, “but very few can showcase in their behaviors, embracing it and using it and holding their [direct reports] accountable to saying, all right, we’re going to embrace this as well.”Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza is a freelance journalist and From Day One contributing editor who writes about work, the job market, and women’s experiences in the workplace. Her work has appeared in the Economist, the BBC, The Washington Post, Inc., Quartz, Business Insider, Fast Company, and Digiday’s Worklife.

Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza | January 22, 2025

Hope for Cynics: How to Replace a Lack of Trust With “Hopeful Skepticism”

“I wrote this book because I needed it,” said renowned psychologist and author, Jamil Zaki, Ph.D. about his latest book, Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness. “I’ve been studying the science of kindness and empathy and connection for 20 years, and oftentimes people assume that must mean that I walk around blissed out by human goodness constantly. But the secret is that this entire time, I’ve tended towards cynicism,” Zaki said during a fireside chat at From Day One’s December virtual conference.In life and in work, cynicism is making us sick, but Zaki offers a cure. While cynicism is an understandable response to injustice and inequality, in many cases it is misplaced. Dozens of studies find that people fail to realize how kind, generous, and open-minded others really are. Dr. Zaki imparts the secret for beating back cynicism: “hopeful skepticism”–thinking critically about people and our problems while honoring and encouraging our strengths.“We are living through a quiet but devastating epidemic of cynicism,” Zaki told session moderator, Megan Ulu-Lani Boyanton, reporter at the Denver Post. In 1972, about half of Americans believed most people could be trusted. By 2018, only a third believed the same. He cites the financial collapse of 2008 as a time when our faith in institutions plummeted. “We are living in a trust deficit. When trust is depressed, cynicism rises. Cynicism is poisonous for our mental health, our physical health, relationships, our communities, including our businesses and organizations and our culture.”But not all hope is lost, cynicism is often just a mistake or a bias. “When you pay closer attention to the data, people tend to be more generous, trustworthy, open minded and kind than we realize,” Zaki said. That’s where his “hopeful skepticism” comes in—“acknowledging that oftentimes our bias means we underestimate each other and by connecting more with the data and with people in general, we can rebuild our sense of faith in each other and use that to fight for a future that more of us want.”Hopeful Skepticism in ActionThe difference between cynicism and skepticism is key. “Skeptics withhold their judgment and look for evidence,” Zaki said. And while optimism, in assuming a positive outcome, can lead to complacency, hope instead can inspire action. “Hope is the belief that things could improve, but that we don’t know that… the future is uncertain, and in that uncertainty, our actions matter.” Therefore, hopeful skeptics are data-driven and withhold assumptions, while knowing that people and situations can surprise us in a positive way.Jamil Zaki, Ph.D., Director of the Stanford Neuroscience Lab and Author, “Hope for Cynics: The Surprising Science of Human Goodness” was interviewed by Megan Ulu-Lani Boyanton, Reporter, the Denver Post (photo by From Day One)At work, cynicism can be lethal, says Ulu-Lani Boyanton. “[There is] a heavy price for mistrust in a corporate environment.” The data shows that cynics are less likely to rise to positions of leadership, have poor morale, perform worse, and are less loyal to organizations. Cynicism spreads easily and having too many cynics at an organization can lead to a collapse of collaboration, innovation, and productivity. “Why take a risk if the person next to you would prefer to see you fail?” Zaki said. “Leaders need to be quite intentional about fostering trust and cooperation, because without that, our tendency is to focus more on the negative.”Political and social polarization can also breed cynicism. “Americans have lost contact with folks who are different from them. We no longer rub shoulders with people who are politically different from us. We’ve sorted so that we interact less with real folks we disagree with. So how do we know who they are?” Zaki said. We rely on media depictions for that information, and often it’s inaccurate. “We conjure up a version of people we disagree with that is quite frightening and quite wrong. And we miss out on the common ground.”This extends to workplace disagreements and divisions. “People stop talking with one another. They start to exaggerate the negative qualities of the other side. They start to think a ‘win’ on the other side is a ‘loss’ on their own. We focus so heavily on what separates us that we lose sight of all the things we have in common,” Zaki said. To solve this within the workplace, Zaki says, bring both sides together and have them list all the things they agree on and disagree on. They will be shocked at how the agreements outweigh the disagreements.Seeing Each Other More ClearlyIt’s incumbent on HR to help team members move past their own biases and internal disagreements. When Zaki surveys employees, he always finds that the vast majority want collaboration and trust to be at the center of their work, and that they also don’t realize that other folks want it too. “If you’re a leader, one way to fight cynicism is not to lie to people, but to tell them the truth and to show them the truth in as quantitative and specific a way as you can,” Zaki said.One way organizations can inspire collaboration, creativity, and trust, Zaki said, is by “rewarding people for not just their individual performance, but how they showed up for their colleagues.” Mission-driven companies like Patagonia or Cotopaxi, that are not only focused on product development but also “advancing a philosophy of caring, not just for ourselves, but for the planet” all speak to Zaki’s tenets of hopeful skepticism.He encourages organizations to invest in developing “soft skills,” or what he calls “human skills,” so that employees can get better at understanding themselves and others and communicate more effectively. Empathy and emotional intelligence are vital to success.Humans suffer from a negativity bias as part of an evolutionary response to physical threats. Noticing that knee jerk response within oneself is key to moving past it. “Being a hopeful skeptic can open us to incredible numbers of social opportunities, whether that’s pleasant conversations with strangers, bridging differences with people we disagree with, building relationships, friendships, collaborations, parenting more effectively, and building more trusting communities. And in all these cases, the steps are simple,” Zaki said. “I’m much more positive and hopeful since researching cynicism, because I realized how much of it is just an error, and that’s true in our politics, in our organizations, but just in our everyday lives as well. Hope is not naïve, it’s not privileged, it’s not toxic. It’s an adaptive and adaptable response to the best data that we have. We can fight for that better future together by seeing it more clearly.”Katie Chambers is a freelance writer and award-winning communications executive with a lifelong commitment to supporting artists and advocating for inclusion. Her work has been seen in HuffPost and several printed essay collections, among others, and she has appeared on Cheddar News, iWomanTV, On New Jersey, and CBS New York.

Katie Chambers | January 13, 2025

How to Leverage AI to Make Room for the Important Stuff

With HR technology revolutionizing how organizations operate, companies that embrace innovative tools can boost employee engagement, streamline processes, and strengthen their bottom line. At From Day One’s November virtual conference, Sonya Echols, vice president of HR at Comcast, shared her insights on HR technology in a fireside chat moderated by Denver Post reporter Megan Ulu-Lani Boyanton.Echols highlighted strategies for integrating technology that elevates HR from a traditional administrative role to a strategic business partner. “There are just so many choices that people have today,” Echols said.  “And really trying to differentiate ourselves is something that we continue to focus on.”At Comcast, the focus on employee development informs their approach to technology: first, choose the right tools, then integrate them effectively. “Making sure that we have a robust learning and management system that meets the needs of our teammates is key,” Echols said. Choosing the Right TechnologyThere are three critical factors to consider when introducing HR technology to an organization, says Echols:Return on Investment (ROI): Investing in HR technology should bring significant value to the organization. "There’s so many things out there that seem exciting, and we all get distracted by the shiny new thing,” Echols said. “But if we’re going to really invest in HR technology, we need to make sure that it’s going to pass the sniff test around ROI.” Organizations must assess whether a new tool will truly enhance operations and deliver measurable benefits.Must-Have vs. Nice-to-Have: HR teams must prioritize essential tools over optional ones. “There are things that we as HR really, really need to be investing in, and then there’s things that are nice to have,” Echols said.  By focusing on must-haves, organizations can free up time and resources for high-impact work. The goal is to choose technology that allows HR to concentrate on strategic tasks rather than administrative processes.Buy or Build?: Deciding whether to purchase or develop HR technology in-house is a crucial step. Echols encouraged companies to weigh the pros and cons of each approach. “When you think about buying HR technology off the shelf, you need to ask yourself, ‘Is this going to be customizable at all, or can I configure this at all?’ Even that could be a little bit costly,” she said. Organizations must also consider whether they have the technical expertise to manage custom solutions.Additionally, Echols stressed the importance of asking the right questions when evaluating technology vendors. “As soon as we deploy this, is it going to be outdated? Is there a newer version coming out? When are there upgrades that we will automatically be able to get from this vendor?” Understanding these dynamics is essential for making informed decisions and avoiding unnecessary expenses.Sonya Echols of Comcast, right, spoke with Megan Ulu-Lani Boyanton of the Denver Post (photo by From Day One)By focusing on ROI, prioritizing must-have solutions, and carefully evaluating the decision to buy or build, organizations can ensure their HR technology investments are effective and future-proof.Thoughtful Integration Is KeyHaving the technology is one thing—integrating is something entirely different. Companies must approach integrating new technologies of any kind as thoughtfully as possible, starting with trust.A culture of trust is imperative. Echols says this should be developed constantly over time. When it comes to building trust during integrating a new technology, open communication is crucial. “Your communication cadence with your folks is also going to be important in building that trust,” Echols said. If you’re not open with employees, people are going to be afraid to ask questions. “But if you let people know, ‘Hey, this is where we’re going, and here’s how we’re going to get there,’ people are receptive to that.”Echols also highlighted the importance of involving end-users early in the process. “Getting more of the users involved sooner is probably the biggest lesson learned,” she said. “Having the people who are going to use it day in and day out get their hands on it as quickly as possible is key.”Interactive training programs, tailored to different user groups, help ease the transition. Additionally, limiting workarounds ensures employees adopt the technology rather than bypassing it. “The number one thing that helps folks adopt new tools is to limit the workarounds,” Echols said. “If people have no choice but to use it, and you show them the way and gently nudge them, they’ll get there.”Change management plays a critical role in integration. Organizations must understand potential resistance points, communicate frequently, and show employees how the technology will improve their work lives. By treating the rollout like a marketing campaign—tailored to address user pain points—companies can foster a smoother adoption process.Helping Employees Take OwnershipOne great feature of modern HR tools is that they allow employees to take ownership of their experiences, creating room for HR teams to focus on strategic initiatives.“When we think about HR technology, most people think about a human capital management system, right? We use Workday here at Comcast,” Echols said.  “It has helped us in HR a lot by empowering our employees, both business leaders and non-people leaders, to own their experience. They can go in, they can look at their information at any time.” Instead of HR personally handling every employee request, technology enables individuals to access information themselves. This evolution is reshaping how HR is perceived within companies. “I think a lot of technology is moving toward self-service versus the white-glove service that we in HR typically provide,” said Echols. “Now that is shifting and evolving so folks can self-serve and allow HR to really be seen as business leaders who happen to sit in HR seats.”By empowering employees with self-service tools, prioritizing strategic technology investments, and focusing on seamless integration, companies can elevate their HR functions from administrative to transformational. Companies should approach HR tech adoption thoughtfully by focusing on ROI, scalability, and trust-building to unlock its full potential.Carrie Snider is a Phoenix-based journalist and marketing copywriter.

Carrie Snider | January 02, 2025