What Motivates Ultra-high Performing Teams?

BY Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza | August 11, 2021

When Capt. Paul Carelli was in the Navy, he would step into a new leadership position every two to three years. During each transition, it was standard practice to get a “pass down,” the former leader’s take on the team’s strengths and weaknesses. “I refused the pass down,” Carelli said. “I would never take anybody's pass down on who was who and what they could do. Because what you would find out is that those people may have been put into a position that they weren't suited for. I didn't want to know about the people from the perspective of the previous leadership. So everybody started off with a clean slate. That was my first step into arranging a high-performance team.” New eyes, a fresh take.

Carelli, who is currently the director of North American flight operations at Kodiak Aircraft Co., which makes short-takeoff-and-landing aircraft, shared his philosophy for building elite teams during a recent From Day One webinar titled “The Need to Exceed: Harnessing Motivation Within Ultra-high-performance Teams.” The webinar featured a panel of five leaders across multiple industries discussing how motivational needs differ when it comes to ultra-high-performance teams, and what tools and techniques leaders can use to drive their elite charges to bold new heights.

Panel moderator Lydia Dishman, a staff editor at Fast Company, opened the conversation by asking panelists to define ultra-high performers in three words. Mathian Osiski, senior director of talent management at Becton, Dickinson and Co., an early manufacturer of syringes that today produces some of the most sophisticated medical technology in the world, said she sees ultra-high performers as those who “consistently exceed expectations.”

“Results, consistency, alignment,” is what Casey Wahl sees in ultra-high-performers. Wahl is the CEO of Attuned, a company that studies intrinsic motivation in the workplace.

Why is it relevant to explore the motivations of such high performers? “Organizations and teams have had to pivot from their traditional ways of working into a more creative, and sometimes radically different, way of working. Individuals who are agile and made that shift are the ones who not only survived, but they also thrived,” said Janet Ghosh, global director of HR at Stanley Black & Decker. The industrial tools manufacturer has been rapidly digitizing its products and piloting new means of using AI to improve tool integration into customers’ operations.

Speaking on ultra-high performers, top row from left, Paul Carelli of Kodiak Aircraft Co. and Janet Ghosh of Stanley Black and Decker. Middle row, from left: Casey Wahl of Attuned, moderator Lydia Dishman of Fast Company, and Nick Allen of Gensler. Bottom row: Mathian Osicki of Becton, Dickinson and Co. (Image by From Day One)

“So, what are some of the common traits these individuals have?” Ghosh said. “What we have experienced in our organization is they have the courage to innovate and do things differently. They are agile in the way they think, they’re inclusive, and they collaborate well, both internally and externally. They're highly resilient, and they are problem solvers.”

Panelists said that being an ultra-high performer is about more than consistently hitting key performance indicators (KPIs) or adapting quickly. Some of the speakers called the necessary element authenticity, others emotional intelligence or social intelligence, but all agreed that there is a qualitative, deeply human element common among ultra-high performers.

Osiski offered this observation about how leaders with such traits helped their employees thrive during the pandemic: “A lot of the folks that float to the top, they're not always the nicest folks. They’re tough and they get there through grit, and sometimes there's a little bit of a trail of destruction,” she said. “Whereas the ones that floated up to the top during Covid were the ones that were actually kind and nice and did it in a way that was not rude, and helped their colleagues along. They're the ones that got discretionary effort as leaders, they're the ones that were able to break boundaries and speed up when necessary.”

Spotting the Ones With Potential

So, how do employers evaluate ultra-high-performance potential? It can be easy to spot metric-based potential by looking at past performance, but panelists emphasized focusing on that authentic, emotionally intelligent quality when vetting candidates both internally and externally. Wahl said a simple addition to their job descriptions–“we want people with a kind heart”–elicited an emotional reaction from applicants and helped them winnow their candidate pool.

Wahl said his customers use Attuned’s intrinsic-motivation assessment, which looks at a person’s value hierarchy, to get a sense of an employee’s EQ, or emotional quotient, and how their values align with team and company goals.

In a workplace culture that puts so much value on metric-based performance, EQ can get ignored, the result being teams that start to look like a homogenous bunch of ladder-climbers. But emotional intelligence is what can turn a strong performer into a high-performer into an ultra-high performer–and elevate others with them.

Speakers on the panel cautioned against trying to replicate the success of one high performer by scouting or hiring a duplicate. “Ultra-high performance does not equate with groupthink,” Dishman pointed out. Nick Allen, a regional talent-development leader for the global design and architecture firm Gensler, said many leaders have a go-to manager they ask to head-up critical teams and projects, but that this is a poor way to maintain strong results because exceptional performance depends on heterogeneous teams and leadership. Each team should be composed with fresh eyes, he said.

The Team Benefits of Diversity

Wahl said diversity is a must if employers are going to build a team that consistently exceeds expectations. “We need it from an ethical and a moral point of view, but also a strategic [point of view] to create innovative products for different markets.” While diversity of experience and thought is necessary, everyone must be united around a common goal, a common value, Wahl explained. “I don't have it from a scientific point of view, but I have it from a lot of data. Teams that are generally aligned by their values are more high-performing,” he said. Denying the importance of diversity is likely why many companies can identify high-performers here and there, but fail to cultivate teams that operate at the ultra-high level.

In order to innovate, and therefore take risks, employees must feel that their environment is safe for risk-taking, whether or not they fall into the ultra-high-performing niche. “You can tell employees to be courageous, you tell employees to really speak up, that we want to hear diversity of thought, but if they don't have that sense of psychological safety, they're not going to,” Allen said.

Psychological safety is motivating for these high-potential outliers. It’s also what you’ll need to create if you want undiscovered outliers to rise up. “You need, as a leader, to foster the culture that allows people to be courageous,” said Carelli. “Because I can tell you, you can be iron-fisted, you can have a great vision, but if you don't foster that culture throughout the whole organization, nobody's going to be courageous in that organization.”

When he served as Naval commanding officer, Carelli said he made a point to acknowledge mistakes. “When we were doing combat operations and I screwed up as the commanding officer of the squadron, I would stand up first and say, ‘Here's what I screwed up this week.’ And I would go into detail.” He said this was how he fostered an environment where it was safe to ask questions, safe to be courageous.

Carelli also said motivation depends on feeling a sense of ownership. “If people don't feel like they have ownership in the process, then there's not going to be a motivation for it. People don't feel valued if they're not given a task, and I can't emphasize that enough. If people aren't valued, there's no way they're going to be courageous. Ownership, I think, is fundamental to getting people to be motivated. You have a goal, inspire them with that goal, give them a vision, give them ownership, and then let them go.”

The Challenge of Sustaining at a High Level

Top-performing employees are especially prone to burnout. Employers have to be aware of this to keep these workers delivering at peak level. Wahl said this is a fact many are aware of, but few address. “The prevailing school of thought is, ‘Push people and create pressure to get results, and if they don’t like it, then this is not the right job for them,’” Dishman observed. But the panelists proposed a new way of taking care of workers.

The speakers encouraged careful distribution of work and constant evaluation of duties, a good practice for any company wanting to prevent burnout across skill levels. Allen said his organization rotates talent through their most challenging projects. “We're thinking about other talent that might be sitting on the side that has that potential, that interest or that passion to come in,” he said. “Because for every team member that's feeling burnt out, there's another team member that's feeling forgotten.”

Wahl reminded employers to be conscious of such structural stressors as international time zones. High-performers will often eat into their free time and weekends to make the meeting or accommodate the schedule. Ghosh said she’s making sure Stanley Black & Decker employees have ample mental-health benefits and employee-assistance programs. She also noted the importance of ongoing performance management: Do you have mentors for these workers? Are you creating clear career paths for them? Is there coaching available? In other words, if you want to maintain ultra-high performers, you must not only motivate, but sustain.

Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza is a writer, editor, and content strategist based in Richmond, Va.


RELATED STORIES

How to Use Skills Data to Power Development and Achieve Business Objectives

The skills required for success are constantly evolving and organizations are struggling to adapt without clear visibility of the strengths and skills gaps in their workforce. This uncertainty leaves talent management and employee development journeys to guesswork, resulting in lost opportunities and strategic missteps. Being armed with skills data and then acting on it is a key strategy to keeping employees happy, loyal, and developing.Organizations that utilize data about their talent's skills, or catalog and organize the skills workers currently possess, as well as identify the skills needed for future roles, are actively preparing their workforce to tackle new challenges as they arise. During a From Day One webinar, leaders discussed how talent skills data can transform your approach to talent management.As a first step, companies must identify which skills are the most relevant to their business’ present and future, the panelists shared. This decision should not be made just by HR, senior leaders, and stakeholders, but by employees at other levels too, says Marquisa Nash, Head of HR, performance materials at BASF. “[There might be a gap between] what leadership thinks is important and what people think is important,” Nash said.Tomislav Vujec, director of learning at Red Hat, says it’s easier for HR to get a buy-in from business leaders when discussing employee skills as opposed to competencies. “We get to be closer to their problems and we open a door to validate what we can actually do, which is develop a skill. As opposed to risking too much by promising a business change, which often does not only depend on the skill being developed, but other factors,” he said.The rapid changes brought about by the pandemic also emphasized the need to focus on skill-building, says Didem Onem, Head of TA operations and programs at Eaton Corporation. “That made us look at our talent and skills availability and ask ‘where are we headed – and are we ready for that?’ It meant bringing a new type of talent into the organization,” she said. For Eaton, this meant an initiative for upskilling in digitization techniques so that employees would be more prepared for a digital way of doing business. Her team mapped out the new skills plan based on manager feedback, honest self-assessments, and forecasted what would be needed down the line.Those self-assessments, though, can be tricky. “Oftentimes people are not terribly good at assessing their own levels of facility with certain things,” said moderator Lydia Dishman, senior editor for growth and engagement at Fast Company. “Is there a way to make sure that what people are reporting is actually where they are?”The panel of industry leaders spoke about "How to Use Skills Data to Power Development and Achieve Business Objectives" in a session moderated by Lydia Dishman of Fast CompanyLarger companies, especially, must work hard to not lose track of  each individual’s growth. “With 600,000 employees all around the globe, it’s hard to know who can do what and what they are good at,” said Abbe Partee, VP, head of global certified learning at DHL. So DHL created a Career Marketplace, which integrates both its learning and performance system. It includes an individual’s skills data not just from self-assessment but also manager feedback, succession planning meetings, and the combined skill profiles of their current and previous roles.“We want to build a culture of learning and continuous education,” Vujec said. That begins at onboarding and continues throughout an employee’s entire career journey, regardless of their level. It’s also important to recognize, he says, that “the foundational skills of today might not be the foundational skills of tomorrow.” In turn, the onboarding itself should serve as a mindset shift to prepare employees for continuous learning, rather than the expectation that development will stop after a few months on the job.Skills data should be something that is embraced by employees. “We know employees want to grow with the organization, and skills is a great conversation to get that going,” said Lucy Beaumont, solution lead, manager and leader at SHL. The biggest shift she is seeing is that the skills conversation during reviews is less about how employees are succeeding in their current roles, but rather where they want to go in the future. “What is your skills potential, and therefore, what is the right career path for you where can you lean into those strengths? If you do have those gaps, and they're relevant to the job you're doing or the job you want to do, how can we get around that and support that?” she said.Post-pandemic, individuals are more acutely focused on whether they are happy in their current position, so it’s important for employers to facilitate those conversations early and help workers move and grow internally, rather than externally, to boost retention.Beaumont says organizations should not only be measuring skills as they stand, but also tracking how those skills gaps are then bridged over time. While pulse surveys are helpful, they can sometimes have a tough time measuring soft skills, such as leadership. Therefore, the hard data must then be analyzed with a human approach. “We do take broad strokes, but then that aggregate view allows us to prioritize and see what it’s hinting at,” Vujec said. HR can allow the data trends to drive what areas will require a deeper, more complex dive.Nash notes this “human skills” area is, ironically, where emerging technology can be the most useful during employee surveys. “We use AI to go back into the comments to extrapolate, to see what other additional data points we can obtain to understand what skills employees are looking for,” Nash said. Then those themes are linked back to the organization’s business strategy and core values.What skills do the panelists see as most valuable going forward? All of them are tied to transformation. They include data analytics, to boost agility in reacting to needs; digitization, to make business more efficient;  a digital mindset when it comes to problem solving; and an overall change in agility. And lastly, the skill of learning itself is vital. “Re-skilling potential: what does it take to be willing and able to learn new skills,” Beaumont shared, is integral in today’s rapidly evolving workforce.Katie Chambers is a freelance writer and award-winning communications executive with a lifelong commitment to supporting artists and advocating for inclusion. Her work has been seen in HuffPost and several printed essay collections, among others, and she has appeared on Cheddar News, iWomanTV, On New Jersey, and CBS New York.

Katie Chambers | September 05, 2024

Innovative and Engaging Approaches for Leadership Development

“The war for talent is over, and talent won.”This was a quote that resonated with Miguel Oliveira, senior HR director supporting the brand management and marketing teams at Danone North America, he said during a recent From Day One webinar.Leaders are now being evaluated “not only on the results they bring to the business, but on results from engagement, well-being, and retention,” he told moderator Lydia Dishman during a From Day One webinar about supporting tomorrow’s leaders.Amanda Grow, director of customer success for ETU, says the company has leadership training programs centered on skills related to values such as authenticity and courage, emotional intelligence, and psychological safety.“I always want to see inclusive and emotionally intelligent leaders, because that really does have a major impact on every organization and your culture and what you're trying to instill in your employees,” said Grow.Things have changed tremendously in the workforce in recent years, which impacts what leadership looks like, says Johann Laville, the chief learning officer at Merck.Remote work is becoming more commonplace, the workforce is younger and more diverse, and “technology is driving our future at light speed,” he said. As a result, leaders are listening more and focusing more on leading with humility, he says.Tips for Training Future LeadersEarly talent programs are a way companies can develop future leaders, says Minh Pham-Costello, vice president of business management at Santander. Employees can get an endorsement from their manager when applying.It’s crucial to make sure the employee is committed to the program “because sometimes you push programs to people and they either don’t have the capacity or the desire,” Pham-Costello said. It is also important to have programs that cater to senior leaders’ professional development needs.Programs for future leaders shouldn’t be one size fits all, according to Grow.“It’s great to have a global skill set that we’re trying to adhere to, but we also need to dig down and go to the level deeper and really understand how those skills show up at different role levels, different proficiency levels, and more, so that you really can personalize some of the training,” said Grow. For example, a senior leader who takes a junior-level course probably won’t find it engaging.The panel of leaders spoke about "Supporting Tomorrow's Leaders: Innovative and Engaging Approaches for Leadership Development" (photo by From Day One)Oliveira compared leadership training to trying to teach someone how to ride a bike. You can have trainees watch a movie on how to do it or “put them on a bike and have someone hold the bike to let them understand how it works,” he said.When exposing employees with leadership potential to management fundamentals, “It’s really important to create ways and mechanisms to give them visibility to what it looks like without the responsibility of leading someone directly,” Oliveira said. “I still see today many people stepping into their first managerial leadership opportunity and they still lack those fundamentals, and unfortunately, those suffering are those reporting to the individual.”How Employees Can Demonstrate Leadership SkillsAlthough organizations are investing in leadership development more than ever before, individuals still need to take the initial steps toward getting to the next level, says Pham-Costello.“Of course, other people can help you, but when you take the initiative with your career, you are not only developing your skill but also showing the organization that you are committed to the company and to your growth,” she said.Business resource groups (BRG) are essential when it comes to leadership development, says Pham-Costello. A BRG “gives you that visibility. People see you leading and influencing.”Laville said Merck has a true gig economy. This means if an employee wants to demonstrate their capability of being an effective leader and there’s something they are passionate about – whether it’s a topic, division, or product – they can apply internally, be interviewed, and be selected.That employee would then have support from the leader who releases them into the gig and the leader who would accept them “to come in and provide a new value,” Laville said.Seeking mentorship is another way for those who wish to be leaders to get to that level. Mentors are “subject matter experts that you can have some really open conversations with to help guide you on that path,” he said.Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, ETU, for sponsoring this webinar.Mary Pieper is a freelance writer based in Mason City, Iowa. 

Mary Pieper | August 20, 2024

Redefining Recruitment: The Advantages and Challenges of Skills-Based Hiring

The HR industry is abuzz with a new phrase, “skills-based hiring,” but according to recent research, relatively few employers are actually following through with it. Why the gap? One major factor is inertia–hiring managers just keep doing what they’ve done in the past.For companies that hire white-collar workers, employers have been slow to look past four-year degree requirements and Fortune 500 employment pedigrees. Even for frontline workforces, where four-year degrees aren’t typically required, hiring managers may favor familiar brand-name employers, specific training programs, or familiar resume histories. The results are much the same.Now, companies are turning their attention to skills-based hiring in which capabilities and potential are given greeter credence than any professional pedigree. How skills-based hiring and talent management affects the frontline workforce was the topic of discussion during a recent From Day One webinar on the advantages and challenges of skills-based hiring.Getting Started With Skills-Based HiringNicole DeLue joined DISH Network, the satellite TV company, about nine months ago. As the new head of talent acquisition and frontline recruiting, one of her first projects has been overhauling the company’s recruitment process. Not an easy feat for a company that hires more than 800 locations. To boot, DISH hadn’t updated its hiring practices in two decades. Her goal has been to update the process into one that prioritizes skills and potential over employment history.Up against a stale process and long-held habits, DeLue evaluated the entire employee experience from application to talent development. “It was important for me to peel back the layers for the end-to-end candidate and employee lifecycle,” she said. “I wanted to take a deep dive and understand, what are we attracting for? How are we evaluating those skills? And are we actually developing those skills? Is what we’re attracting and qualifying candidates for is what we’re actually developing? Are employees being evaluated on the skills they’re being hired for?”The move to skills-based hiring helps level the playing field for applicants, and for the business, it helps solve the ongoing problem of talent scarcity. “The workforce has really changed over the past couple of years,” said panelist Lori Mix, SVP of talent acquisition at customer experience outsourcing company ibex. “Some specialized areas, like healthcare and finance, have moved to the skills space because there just aren’t enough workers.”Prioritizing skills and potential is also good for the bottom line, Mix pointed out, because it equips the company to grow and adapt in the future. “We want to have choices and give people opportunities to come into the company,” she said. “And as we grow, and are solving our customers’ hiring problems, we want to put people in that are going to be good leaders down the road. So we have to make sure we’re hiring the right skill set from the get-go.”Journalist Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza spoke with Dan Sapir of JobGet, Nicole DeLue of DISH Network, and Lori Mix of ibex during the From Day One webinar (photo by From Day One)Dan Sapir, general manager of frontline job platform JobGet, says this new approach to hiring has proven to motivate and energize a part of the workforce whose upward career potential has long been limited. “What we see in our own ecosystem is that as we expose job seekers to jobs that they had no clue they’d be a good fit for, they’re more excited to apply. They’re more excited when they go through the application process. And when they talk to the hiring team, they come off more personable. And because they’re more excited about that role, they stick around for a longer time.”Breaking Old Hiring Habits to Find the Best CandidatesSkills-based hiring is still a relatively new practice for many organizations, and many recruiting leaders have a long road of habit-breaking ahead of them.DeLue found that hiring managers at DISH were so involved in the hiring process, some were even reviewing resumes. Not only is that a time-waster, it can bias the managers, who may be inclined to evaluate candidates on past employers or jobs rather than future potential.Now, she’s waiting until the interview stage to show candidate profiles to hiring managers, and they’ve experimented with removing candidates’ names and previous employers altogether.“There are so many different ways that you can do it, but I think that it boils down to instilling confidence in your customer,” she said. “It’s about getting alignment on the skills you’re screening for, and not the profile. The minute that you let [managers] go back to ‘they worked at this company, and we just had five people a trip from that company,’ you’re going to get in that vicious cycle.”At ibex, Mix uses resumes to start conversations that can help her evaluate sought-after skills. For instance, she doesn’t let an employment gap disqualify an applicant. “There are so many life events and real-world issues driving reductions in force and employment gaps. I want to leverage the interview by focusing on what their attitude is on overcoming all those challenges,” she said. The company needs people who are good at problem-solving, are quick thinkers, have good attitudes, and possess the flexibility to overcome challenges—these aren’t skills that can be deduced from employment history.Skills-based hiring expands the internal talent pool as well, making it easier for the company to recruit and retain from within. To this end, ibex has coaching and mentorship programs that open workers to new jobs and careers with the company. “Our frontline workforce understands that they can take different paths,” Mix said. “They can pursue the leadership trajectory or they can be a subject matter expert, but either way, you know that there’s growth potential.”In frontline jobs, where turnover is typically quite high, giving workers the opportunity to move around can keep them there for longer. Career growth is a retention strategy, JobGet’s Sapir says. “There are a lot of job seekers that have transferable skills from one role to the next, and the more you can encourage them to look at other opportunities that they could be a great fit for, it actually helps make your company sticky.”Sapir pointed out that as promising as skills-based hiring is, workers and job seekers aren’t accustomed to this new way of doing things. Used to traditional job requirements, they may be self-selecting out of great positions, so companies need to budge their audience, he said. “You want to encourage more people that, if you think you’re a good fit for some of this stuff, please apply.”Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, JobGet, for sponsoring this webinar. Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza is a freelance journalist and From Day One contributing editor who writes about work, the job market, and women’s experiences in the workplace. Her work has appeared in the Economist, the BBC, The Washington Post, Quartz, Fast Company, and Digiday’s Worklife.

Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza | August 12, 2024