Cultural Intelligence: Bringing Inclusion That’s Natural Rather Than Forced

BY Susan Kelly | June 21, 2022

Talent management these days can feel like an endless cycle of attracting and welcoming new hires into the workplace, only to be followed by frustration when those employees leave just as it seemed they were settling in.

The Great Resignation, which goes by many names, has seen record numbers of Americans quit their jobs over the past two years, even as employers spend billions developing programs to encourage them to stay.

High on the list of reasons why workers move on from an organization is a feeling of not belonging, Keyla Waslawski, a VP of sales and marketing with the Cultural Intelligence Center, said in a presentation at From Day One’s June virtual conference on bringing more inclusive approaches to diversity.

Waslawski advocates for a strategy that uses the framework of cultural intelligence to tackle the challenges of employee retention. That calls for confronting one of the thornier, unintended problems employers are coming up against: diversity fatigue.

U.S. businesses spend an estimated $8 billion a year on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) training, in hopes of unlocking the potential of those crucial goals. But some of those efforts are falling flat, because to employees they often they feel forced, uncomfortable or, worse yet, polarizing, Waslawski said.

Keyla Waslawski, a VP of sales and marketing with the Cultural Intelligence Center (Company photo)

“We recognize the importance of building the right culture, one that promotes inclusion, and yet we still see record high resignations, we still have managers who are burned out, we still see our talent leave as fast as we find it. As leaders, then, it’s up to us to change our approach so that we can build effective inclusion programs,” she said.

Programs that focus on evaluation, rather than on bringing people together, increase feelings of polarization, Waslawski said. Initiatives that emphasize awareness and facts rather than adaptability and action can lead to mechanical, unnatural interactions between colleagues because they reinforce stereotypes instead of allowing unique individuals to get to know one another.

Systematic inclusion, however, can be hard work. Burnout among managers often stems from efforts to bring together, in a productive way, a group of people who think and work very differently.

Waslawski shared her own story of frustration involving a team member who never followed through with an approach to a project once it was agreed upon in a meeting. The employee would nod in agreement, then go in a different direction afterward. “It was driving me nuts,” she said. “I was expected to finish projects as the leader of the department, and I couldn’t seem to get on the same page as my team.”

By researching the employee’s cultural values, Waslawski found that her team member preferred a chain-of-command hierarchy and was uncomfortable expressing an opposing view in a group. She asked her colleague after a meeting to follow up with an agreement in writing. “This simple change changed everything. It allowed her not to disagree in person, but in the safety of our one-on-one interaction,” Waslawski said.

Waslawski drew upon her own cultural intelligence to solve the dilemma she faced when running her staff meetings. “I learned not how to manage those meetings differently, but rather how to leverage the different voices I had at the table,” she said.

Cultural intelligence, said Waslawski, values the uniqueness and authenticity of the individual and supports belonging within a working group without forcing assimilation. It allows people to engage effectively with others from different cultural backgrounds, encompassing nationality, ethnicity, age, gender and even function.

“To be a truly inclusive culture,” she said, “we have to approach our initiatives in a way that supports uniqueness and belonging simultaneously. If we want our talent to stay, we need to ensure our people are accepted and accepting.”

Waslawski outlined four components of cultural intelligence:

Drive: The motivation and confidence to engage with others who are different.

Knowledge: The understanding of cultural differences.

Strategy: Considering and preparing for cultural differences before an interaction.

Action: Behavioral flexibility.

“When pulling all four of these together, cultural intelligence allows us to build the foundation of an inclusive culture, where individuals and teams feel they belong as who they are, because it taps into what’s personal in each of us–our own motivations, knowledge, our values,” she said.

A slide from Waslawski’s presentation (Courtesy of the Cultural Intelligence Center)

To use cultural intelligence to retain talent, learning should focus on differences beneath the surface rather than on those that are obvious–such as skin color, gender and age–and tend to be polarizing. “If we focus on differences at the core, how we’re raised differently, even in our own homes neighbor to neighbor, it allows us to take a culturally intelligent approach and focus on who we are, not how we look,” Waslawski said.

Build organizations by adding what’s missing from the culture, she advised, rather than bringing in people who fit in or add more of what’s already working.

Leveraging the capabilities of cultural intelligence can develop unconscious inclusion that is flexible and focused on the needs of others, fostering an environment of trust in complex, multicultural situations, Waslawski said. The flexibility of the approach aims to move people beyond awareness and into action.

Because it is malleable, cultural intelligence is a skill that is in each individual and can be improved upon. It’s an approach that does not need to be driven from the top down to succeed, and it is focused on development, not evaluation, Waslawski emphasized. Two decades of research shows that people with higher levels of cultural intelligence are more adaptable, make better decisions and negotiate more effectively, she said. The result is more innovation, creativity and sharing of ideas.

“In other words, cultural intelligence allows us to unlock diversity’s promise to us,” she said.

Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, Cultural Intelligence Center, who sponsored this Thought Leadership Spotlight.

Susan Kelly is a freelance business journalist based in Chicago.


RELATED STORIES

Winning Strategies for Delivering an Inclusive Employee-Engagement Experience

The integration of new technology has transformed HR, enabling people leaders to shift their focus from traditional desk tasks to using this technology to build more inclusive and genuinely engaging workplaces.Sloan Kendall, head of global partnerships at Blink, and Caroline Mikhail, director of advisory services at LineZero, spoke in a thought leadership spotlight about winning strategies for delivering an inclusive employee-engagement experience at From Day One’s November virtual conference.The Five Engagement StrategiesThe first key strategy is leveraging technology to create an inclusive experience. Newer technology should meet employees where they are, provide easy authentication, and be highly personalized.For example, Blink helped a transportation company improve communication with their non-tech-oriented frontline workers using a mobile app with manager-led activation, says Mikhail. This successfully executed and personalized solution accommodated employees who have access to mobile phones instead of computers.Caroline Mikhail, director of advisory services at LineZero, spoke during the thought leadership spotlight (company photoThe second strategy is utilizing the strengths of a multigenerational workforce, as the social skills and technological knowledge of each generation differ from one another. Reverse mentorship programs facilitate younger generation employees sharing modern tech knowledge with older generation employees. Further, they learn valuable social skills from older employees.A workforce with diverse and inclusive skill sets enables leaders to use modern social tools, like short-form videos, to share information and provide feedback effectively. This approach ensures that socially and culturally relevant communication channels are accessible and beneficial for all employees.A third key strategy is to develop authentic connections in the workplace. When combined with technology, it cultivates more authentic employee engagement.Shadowing programs are ways for company executives and leaders to meet employees within different departments and learn about their daily responsibilities. Posting videos of the experience, featuring different employee experiences each time, encourages participation and enhances employees’ connection to one another.Other mentorship and development programs further facilitate direct communication between leaders and employees. Mikhail shared how an executive created a skill-sharing channel to recommend books and create discussion among employees. Such programs and initiatives, enhanced by new social mediums using technology, provide enriching and unique engagement where employees feel authentically seen, understood, and appreciated by their leaders and peers.The fourth strategy is to embrace champions as workplace ambassadors. Champions further help employees adapt to new technology and communication channels by answering questions and explaining the advantages to employees and the organization.The fifth key strategy is data-driven iteration. While traditional data remains essential for informed decision-making and improving financial outcomes, leveraging technology to filter and display diverse employee data on dashboards enables leaders to better strategize around engagement and development.They can obtain data on individual employees and teams and access summarized data revealing specific trends, helping people leaders create relevant solutions and development and mentorship opportunities. More inclusive datasets also inform leaders on the ways new tools are used so they can shift to more intuitive approaches that reap the most benefits.Inclusivity MattersInclusive solutions sustain hybrid workplaces. Frontline workers aren’t working at desks on computers and may not see their supervisors, managers, or people leaders on a day-to-day basis.Making technological innovation accessible to all employees drives better business outcomes by addressing the unique needs of both teams and individuals.Inclusive engagement fosters stronger peer connections through improved internal communication, boosts productivity by delivering role-specific solutions, and increases employee visibility through diverse social engagement channels.Kendall highlighted the partnership between Blink, a mobile-first employee experience and communication platform, and LineZero, a consultancy specializing in employee experience and change management. Together, they aim to help organizations strengthen connection, culture, and communication in the digital age.“Together we’re really setting up to deliver an experience that enables organizations to empower their employees to better communicate, to engage, and to access relevant systems and tools all in one centralized application,” said Kendall.Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, LineZero, for sponsoring this thought leadership spotlight. Stephanie Reed is a freelance news, marketing, and content writer. Much of her work features small business owners throughout diverse industries. She is passionate about promoting small, ethical, and eco-conscious businesses.

Stephanie Reed | December 18, 2024

The Connection Cure: Reviving Inclusion and Restoring Belonging in a Divided World

In 2024, 52% of workers say that increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is a good thing—a 4% decrease from 2023. Meanwhile, 21% of workers say DEI is a bad thing, a 5% increase from last year. Workers’ perceptions of DEI and its significance have shifted.What has contributed to workers starting to see division rather than belonging with DEI? Teresa Hopke, CEO of Talking Talent shared her insights during a thought leadership spotlight at From Day One’s Brooklyn conference.Hopke discussed several important factors contributing to a shift in the perception of inclusion. The biggest factor is not prioritizing more inclusive connections, she says. Organizations must redefine what inclusion is and bridge the gaps in workplace connections to restore confidence in DEI. Because DEI, Hopke emphasizes, will always improve rather than harm business outcomes.Inclusion and Belonging StrategiesHow can business leaders redefine and optimize DEI to become more inclusive? How can DEI strategies restore belonging in the workplace and continue to help marginalized employees authentically achieve professional success? Hopke shared three strategies for fostering inclusion and belonging within the workplace. First, creating connection circles, a structured group or gathering designed to bring together people from various levels, positions, and cultural backgrounds within an organization, helps unite workers.Next, the Human Library methodology offers a unique, voluntary approach where individuals “check out” an employee to learn about a topic or experience they are unfamiliar with. The employee, possessing specialized knowledge, shares insights and teaches them about that subject.Hopke led a thought leadership spotlight about "The Connection Cure: Reviving Inclusion and Restoring Belonging in a Divided World"Finally, reverse leadership programs involve a reverse mentorship approach, where leaders gain insights from employees at different professional levels about the experience of belonging to an outgroup within the organization.These are authentic solutions promoting connection and understanding among different groups, says Hopke.Becoming More Connected, Not DividedRestoring connection within the workplace is at the heart of Talking Talent, coaching leaders at organizations on how to create and strengthen their DEI initiatives.The company offers several solutions, from safe communication practices to “helping systematically oppressed and underrepresented groups into senior leadership roles.” Its coaching solutions have led to positive business outcomes: 75% of their clients have won awards and occupied top league tables for DEI.However, outside of Talking Talent, one drawback of DEI that organizations have observed is employees feeling categorized and labeled. The compartmentalization can make workers feel ashamed and ostracized. For example, Hopke discussed how society normally perceives white men as the group historically embodying the status quo, yet this doesn’t account for white men who didn’t attend prestigious colleges, are neurodivergent, or aren’t heterosexual.This may explain the growing disconnection that white men feel from DEI efforts. A study from the Pew Research Center shows that 47% of white workers believe DEI practices hurt white men.Furthermore, Hopke emphasizes that DEI practices can tokenize marginalized groups and their experiences, also contributing to decreasing positivity toward DEI. “We also have to make sure that we’re not using connection and thinking of it as a fluffy term. It actually can create change in your organization,” she said. This is because connection is a biological need and addressing this need creates better business outcomes.“I am going to guess that there isn’t one business problem you have in your strategy that can’t be solved with more connection, whether it’s client-facing, whether it's market-facing, whether it’s internal—connection is the cure,” she said.So, how can organizations make the work around belonging prioritize connection rather than division? Hopke says to focus on what unites people rather than divides them and engages them in cross-cultural dialogue. People stay at organizations when they feel authentic belonging and connection.“We have to make this about everyone,” she said. “We can’t use shame, we can’t use labels, and we can’t put people into categories. We need to create cultures where everyone uses empathy, understanding, and curiosity to connect with each other.”Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, Talking Talent, for sponsoring this thought leadership spotlight.Stephanie Reed is a freelance news, marketing, and content writer. Much of her work features small business owners throughout diverse industries. She is passionate about promoting small, ethical, and eco-conscious businesses

Stephanie Reed | December 17, 2024

Compensation-Planning: Best Practices and Trends

When you think about compensation planning for your organization, what comes to mind? If it’s not approached strategically, it can harm your business. HR managers often face the challenge of balancing company budgets with the need to offer competitive pay scales. Research from Visier, a platform that helps businesses and employees by combining people and business data to provide insights, found that a failure to identify and quickly address wage compression issues in teams can lead to faster resignations.Business News Daily defines compensation planning as encompassing all the compensatory elements of a company’s strategy, including employee wages, partner discounts, and raise schedules. These compensation decisions impact more than just finances; they shape an employee’s attitude toward the company, influence their work effort, and determine how long they stay with the organization.“When pay is adjusted quickly the length of tenure is significantly longer,” said Sean Luitjens, general manager, total rewards at Visier. Luitjens spoke during a From Day One webinar about “Compensation-Planning: Best Practices and Trends,” moderated by journalist Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza.Visier research revealed that new employees who received a raise within their first month stayed with their company for an average of 31.5 months. In contrast, employees who received a raise within six months quit 1.8 times sooner than those with annual raises, and those who had no raise at all quit 2.3 times sooner. That’s why more compensation planning cycles are crucial for your overall company success.Sean Luitjens, general manager, total rewards at Visier, led the webinarUtilizing data analytics to identify key issues for your company enables informed decisions around pay. This process shouldn’t be rushed just to check a box. The advantage of having a tech and data strategy is clear: “When you start to break it down between the details, eligibility, budget, bonus LTI, and then try to take all that and create a pay philosophy, it’s exceedingly complex,” said Luitjens.Organizations can leverage data analysis by tapping into various sources, such as performance reviews and sales targets. Building more data points and reference benchmarks allows for continuous improvement. The key is aligning this data with your business goals to inform pay decisions. Factors such as an employee’s role, performance, and tenure in the position should also be considered.Managers must also gain the knowledge of compensation planning. If they cannot understand it, how can they execute and communicate it to their team? When you give them an anchor point, explain why you are giving them that number, says Luitjens. “Put yourself in a B2C marketing position and put on your UX hat, and start to work yourself back on how they would work through the process, rather than sending an Excel spreadsheet,” he said.Luitjens ended with a summary of three compensation planning best practices, again emphasizing the importance of the manager experience in the process:Define your destination and the road there.Place manager experience at the center of delivering pay philosophy. Create a cynical and ever improving data strategy.“When it comes to compensation planning specifically, really place the manager’s experience at the center of delivering the pay philosophy.”Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, Visier, for sponsoring this webinar.Mary Jones is a freelance writer out of Ohio. Her work is featured in several publications including The Dallas Express, NDash, and The Daily Advocate.

Mary Jones | December 17, 2024