Beyond Diversity: Bringing Substance to Inclusion and Belonging

BY the Editors | August 05, 2022

What happens after a surge of commitment to hiring for diversity? Only with the follow-through can progress be sustained. How can companies embrace their increasing diversity? What are the best ways to disrupt the old corporate culture without breaking what is still productive? According to employees, what specifically gives them a sense of belonging? And what are the benefits to the company? From Day One gathered experts for a virtual conference in February. Among the highlights:

Believe: Building a Corporate Culture of Trust and Transparency 

Depending on whether you're consulting Psychology Today, Healthline, the Merriam-Webster, or other resources, you are unlikely to find a cut-and-dried definition of trust. Psychology Today defines it as “the belief that someone or something can be relied on to do what they say they will.” The Merriam Webster dictionary offers: “assured reliance on the character, ability, strength, or truth of someone or something.”

That’s because, as pointed out by Alexa Teare, the chief people and coaching officer at the coaching program LingoLive, trust rests on the multiple levels: self-social-systemic, which translates in work parlance to individual-team-organization. “As humans, it's essential for us to have trust in our organization,” she told Courtney Connley, senior editor of the women’s membership network Chief and the moderator for a panel titled “Building a Culture of Trust and Transparency.”

Teare sees this multi-faceted and multi-layered definition of trust both as a challenge but also an opportunity. It is, for instance, an opportunity for leaders to talk about mutual accountability. “A leader is charged with creating trust. Someone in corporate is charged with creating trust,” Teare continued. “There's something to be said about reciprocity in trust amongst all individuals, starting with the definition of what it means to us, and talking about what role each of us is going to be playing.”

A core tenet of a culture of trust is curiosity. “Even though you're remote, don't lose sight of being curious,” said DeShaun Wise Porter, the VP and global head of diversity, equity, inclusion and engagement at Hilton. “Don't lose sight of the experience of building the relationships.” For instance, it's unadvisable to start a conversation jumping directly into work. “Practice active listening,” said Porter. "Seek to learn and grow beyond your inherent beliefs."

Where there's social and racial tension, for example, one must lean in and ask questions, and stop and check in on people: to create a culture of accountability, start within yourself. "It's not one singular, big training session," warns Porter. “It's day to day, moment to moment action. So many of us have things that we know or thought we knew.”

Speaking on trust, top row from left: Moderator Courtney Connley of Chief, Annie Rosencrans of HiBob, and DeShaun Wise Porter of Hilton. Bottom row: Joy Dettorre of IBM, Sheryl Battles of Pitney Bowes, and Alexa Teare of LingoLive (Images by From Day One)

A strong sign of accountability is transparency, especially in terms of salary. Annie Rosencrans, who is leading the people and culture division in the North American expansion of the HR software company HiBob, has always been about establishing policies where there hadn't been any, and while the margin of error is quite narrow, she sees it as a possibility for improvement and positive evolution. “Make sure you're developing policies that are fair and make sense for your business,” she said regarding a matter of salary transparency. “Understand your business and make policies that don't have arbitrary rules.” When it comes to compensation, though, there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. “But,” said Rosencrans, “it’s important that the philosophy is articulated and based on benchmark data and internal analysis. Make sure that when decisions are made, you abide by that [analysis.] The second you undermine it, you lose trust.”

Despite the climate of reckoning following George Floyd’s murder in May 2020, leaders working with a multinational workforce know that diversity goes beyond ethnic heritage. Sheryl Battles is the VP of global diversity and inclusion at the global shipping and mailing company Pitney Bowes, where in the last year she spearheaded the rollout of a customized inclusive-leadership training program for managers at all levels. A particular success story involves a Midwestern manager, an older white man, who had a direct report who was a woman from Africa. Whenever they spoke, she averted her gaze. “In some work we were doing in advance, there was a discussion on culture,” said Battles. “In her culture, this was an act of deference to an elder, and the manager had an aha-moment.”

Similarly, Joy Dettorre, EdD, the global head of diversity, equity and inclusion at IBM sees empathy and storytelling as core tenets towards a more comprehensive understanding of diversity. IBM, a pioneer of remote work practices for the past two decades, had to take this into account when interacting with the Indian workforce: most of them, in fact, always went to the office. When they got sent home early in the pandemic, one of the local managers explained to her that in her multigenerational household, her need for an at-home workstation was invading on her family’s home space. “Culturally and socially, that's not where she worked,” said Dettorre. “We needed to be sensitive about that.”

In the mental-health conversation, leaders tend to be forgotten. They’re as exhausted as their employees, yet they’re most often called to provide support. “You can't pour from an empty cup,” said Teare. “As a leader, I think there's a certain level of responsibility we hold ourselves accountable for. Many leaders hold that burden: I think there’s a space for us to be intentional with when to charge the trust battery.”  One of the upsides of the past two years, she reflected, is folks feeling more comfortable being vulnerable. “What it taught me is how to share the burden in a transparent way,” she said. “Think about what drains us and what fills us up and be very intentional about that: mental health and wellness talk can be nebulous without a tangible practice–take what's nebulous and apply it to a daily practice.”

Vulnerability also means openly acknowledging one’s own shortcomings. Dettorre, for example, recalls that once she was tasked with creating materials for an experience titled “Gender Transition in the Workplace.” “We thought we were good at it, my heart was in the right place, but my knowledge was not there,” she admitted. She then reached out to transgender [colleagues], simply asking help me: will you co-create this experience with me? “It’s OK not to have all of the answers: I am not afraid to say, I am sorry I made a mistake, I want to get better,” she said. People are usually receptive.

Overall, what matters in building trust is consistency. “Trust is a thing that takes months to build and moments to crush,” said Porter. “Consistency in actions and behaviors is the one thing people will have to look to and rely on heretofore.”–By Angelica Frey

Maintaining Momentum After the Moment of Reckoning 

“There’s a 71% increase in DEI globally: it’s huge,” said Tanya Odom.

Friends jokingly refer to Tanya Odom, director of the equity and inclusion program at the Walton Family Foundation, as an encyclopedia. She has the habit of citing or quoting academic articles, data, and statistics when making a point. A former management consultant and an educator, she sees it as an effective tool to get her message and method across. “There’s a robust amount of research about some of this work, both what works and what gets in the way,” she told Erica Licht, the director of research projects, at the Institutional Antiracism and Accountability Project at Harvard’s Ash Center. “And I think sometimes, we don’t really respect the diversity, equity and inclusion space or the research around what it takes to do this.” Odom sees the main drivers of equity culture in leadership, communication and, mostly, education and accountability. She mentions Valerie Rainford as an authority on data collection on what she and her peers are trying to do. “The willingness to face the data is integral,” said Odom.

Since May 2020, she has constantly been asked the same question: is there a blueprint on how to move past this “excitable moment” pertaining to maintaining momentum after the great reckoning? Recently, she was on the phone with George Floyd’s aunt, talking about what happened in the aftermath of his murder and the overly enthused push for DEI in corporate America. “The reality is that there are people who are continuing to do the work, there have always been these people. When we look outside of philanthropy, I see the work of diversity leaders: They haven’t stopped, and are now working harder than ever,” she told Licht. “The challenge,” Odom continued, “comes when we think where the end point is.” It’s not about one incidence, one moment in time. She is sure that, out of the many organizations that called her in “to do the work,” some just did that to check a box. On a positive note, younger generations are seen as a critical component in the effort, as many of them believe that diversity is the norm. “There’s an expectation for it, there’s a concern and a real desire for companies to address some of these issues,” she said.

Tanya Odom of the Walton Family Foundation, left, and Erica Licht of Harvard University

Still, good will and hard work bring short-lived results without knowledge and education. “The challenge that many of us are facing internally is that there is no set of shared competencies around what someone would want a DEI director to have,” she explained, noting that in her role, she is not dealing with HR issues like talent retention and recruiting. “I don't feel our skillset is recognized: We're the ones, often, if someone cares about belonging, we're the ones they come to. We're the ones that, when something happens in the world, we have to think how to talk about this internally. One day we'll see it, but at this point we still don't understand the scope and depth of people who inhabit these roles.”

In fact, Odom observed a lack of thoroughness in appraising past research and authoritative figures in the field led to “sort of stopgap measures.” Prior to this fireside chat, Odom was in touch with a professor around creating an inclusive workplace and helping people understand racial economic inequality. “But this exists on a university’s website, you know. It’s there,” she said. While a resource such as this needs to be actively shared and made readily available, Odom sees a good practice industry-wide: organizations are looking for coaches, namely people who have both DEI backgrounds and coaching experience. “It's the shared accountability, it’s the continuing education,” she said. “I continue learning, I don’t stop going to webinars. I don’t feel like I’m in a position of I know everything, and I'm done. And in fact, I feel a sense of responsibility to continue my own learning. Since my job, my role, my passion is to help others learn as well.”–By Angelica Frey

Easing the Emotional Burden of Representing a Rising Identity

The modern workforce is seeing employees from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds exhibit increased signs of stress–more than peers who do not share these backgrounds. At the From Day One conference, a panel professionals with backgrounds in mental health and DEI delved into the matter in a panel titled “Easing the Emotional Burden of Representing a Rising Identity.”

The rise in stress levels can be attributed to both a blurred work-life balance as well as said individuals carrying a heavier emotional load than most due to the varying inequalities that intersectional identities tend to bear. The combination of this reckoning and the heightened focus on supporting employees from marginalized backgrounds have led companies to the forefront of a revolution advocating for equitable, safe environments where people of all backgrounds can feel secure.

The question is: are they delivering?

Singleton Beato, global chief DEI o fficer at McCann Worldgroup, illustrates what a workplace that misses the mark on inclusion cultural sensitivity looks like. “It’s consistent behaviors that look like a lack of consciousness on the part of the dominant group of a workplace in the day-to-day exchanges, interactions and decisions, and create an environment where underrepresented groups don’t feel valued,” she said, adding that the impact results in a loss of talent and rich perspectives of employees.

“We spent decades telling people, ‘bring your full selves to work,’ but weren’t prepared to deal with the messiness of humanity,” said Khalil Smith, VP of inclusion, diversity and engagement at the digital content-delivery service Akamai, noting that in the wake of the pandemic, traditionally underrepresented groups carried the weight of losses more than others.

Regarding the oft-referenced lines barely separating personal lives from work lives, the truth behind just how intersectional identities lead to unique challenges and struggles has become more apparent as mounting video conferences shed light into people’s private worlds.

Speaking on rising identities, top row from left: David Thigpen of the University of California, Berkeley, Khalil Smith of Akamai, and Idit Aronsohn of Amdocs. Middle row: Renu Sachdeva of Talking Talent, Nick Ferraiolo of Elm City Coaching, and Mercedes Studio of Maven. Bottom row: Singleton Beato of McCann Workgroup.

“As many organizations are there out there, there’s so many stages where they’re on their own DEI journey and on the way to building a culture of inclusion,” said Renu Sachdeva, an executive coach at Talking Talent. She makes it a point to note that there are companies that have been committed to DEI from the start, and others that received a wake-up call after the murder of George Floyd that sparked the mass social-justice movement of 2020.

“The first thing any organization needs to do is take a good hard look at where they are on their journey and where they aspire to go, and then map out how to get there,” she said.

Beato points out that there is a marked shift in interpretation behind the message of encouraging employees to show up as their authentic selves, acknowledging that the current climate has driven a different approach that companies are not equipped to manage.

And then of course, the concept of mental health and its correlation with encouraging employees to show up authentically. For many folks, boiling down the exacerbated burnout in the last two years to simply overworking doesn’t illustrate the full picture. In the case of many groups, it is the lack of community or availability of contexts that embrace identity, such as employee resource groups, limiting the spaces for marginalized groups to be themselves.

Historically speaking, society has only recently begun to take mental health seriously, recognizing a healthy mindset as a core tenet of well-being. The corporate work environment is not far behind, playing catchup in determining how best to leverage resources to support employees while sustaining Odom business as usual.

“We take technical leaders and ask them to be mental health professionals, people that are really strong as individual contributors, and say ‘Hey, go do that and teach other people.’ It’s not just the individual, it’s the system. We’re asking more of each person at work than ever before, and with fewer resources. But we’re starting to see how the system and the rhetoric are matching up.”

Apart from the fact that many companies are finally jumpstarting overdue efforts in supporting diversity and inclusion, the flip side is in contending for the exhaustion of groups who have long fought for equality and acceptance for all underrepresented groups, no matter race, religion, physical disabilities, and mental health, only to be met with little success. The renewed conversation around race that began in 2020 and the many issues around diversity and inclusion exasperated those who were all too familiar with these intersectional issues that were now making headlines, as though existing for the first time.

Mercedes Samudio, LCSW, a mental-health parenting coach forh Maven, the family health platform, sums up the experience of long-time proponents of change in one word: fatigued.

She points to the emotional burden that marginalized groups have always shouldered, such as pointing out microaggressions and passive-aggressive behaviors, or constantly having to explain their perspective or educate their peers. Before diversity and inclusion became a corporate issue, affirmation of this invisible burden was virtually nonexistent; over time, the compounding experience of microaggressions and feelings of invisibility inevitably impacted the productivity and demeanor of affected individuals.

Panelists agreed that the biggest hurdle in supporting marginalized employees lies in the lack of infrastructure built to accommodate for mental health and wellness, leaving well-intentioned leadership professionals struggling to adequately help their teams.

In addition, a meaningful aspect of reconfiguring organizational approaches to supporting employees with different needs lies in paying attention to greater cultural and political context in society. This can mean individuals must learn to identify unconscious bias and beliefs in themselves and others, and how to work towards resolving them.

“It has to be systemic in order for us to lift that burden off of supervisors who aren't mental health professionals, but want to be able to bring mental wellness into their workplace,” Mercedes said.–By Tania Rahman

Ensuring Equity in a Hybrid Work Environment 

As the shift to hybrid workforces becomes permanent, how can DEI professionals support employee engagement and ensure that virtual workers don’t get left behind? Felicia Robinson, chief people and inclusion officer at the child care provider Bright Horizons, addressed this question in a Thought Leadership Spotlight at the conference. Her presentation focused on how Bright Horizons thinks about reimagining employee engagement, benefits programs, and employee well-being.

“When we think about the hybrid workforce, folks working remotely, folks working in the office, folks deciding to move away to different locations that are not in the same city as their organization. How do we think about engagement, retention, onboarding, leadership development and, frankly, employee burnout?” Robinson asked. “When we think about DEI through the lens of the hybrid workforce, there are actually some positives and some not so positives.”

Flexibility is at the top of Robinson's list of positives, especially for people of color, parents with childcare concerns, and people with disabilities or chronic health issues. Greater job opportunities outside of the area where one lives, as well as lower impact on the environment and time saved by working from home, are other pluses of the hybrid workplace. But remote work environments also have the potential to promote inequity.

According to Robinson, people of color are less likely to be in remote-friendly jobs. One reason, according to a 2021 Pew Research study, is that Black and Hispanic adults are less likely than white adults to have the needed equipment and high-speed internet arrangements at home. Pre-Covid, when less than 30% of all workers could work from home, only 16% of Latino workers and 19% of black workers had remote flexibility. That’s compared to 37% of Asian workers and 30% of white workers. Those figures are much higher now. At Bright Horizons, 30% of employees worked remote in 2019, and that figure post-pandemic is up to 45% of employees working from home.

Felicia Robinson of Bright Horizons

“Employees who put more face time at the office might be more likely to receive various opportunities, promotions, and the hallway conversations where sometimes business gets conducted," Robinson says, "while remote workers can unintentionally fall behind because proximity bias is actually a major challenge."

"Engagement looks very different in a hybrid work environment,” Robinson says. “Since the pandemic, we've asked for representatives from employees with different work schedules to participate in our Better Together engagement groups to make sure we keep all of our employees connected.”

Bright Horizons also reimagined their employee value proposition (EVP), which is called Passion, Purpose, and Possibilities. The questions they asked: How do you bring that to life in a hybrid workforce? What is the contract? How do we look at EVP through all angles of the various employee schedules that we have available?

“When you think about DEI, a hybrid workforce and making that work for all employees, we have to take to step back and think about inclusion,” Robinson says. “It can be a form of exclusion, to only have a mindset of ‘How do we engage if people are physically together?’ The good news is you don’t have to reinvent the wheel, you can just look at your current engagement offerings and activities and actions that you're taking, look at your talent development strategies, and reconsider those through that new lens of the workforce that you’re supporting.”

Employee benefits and employee assistance programs also need to shift with the changing landscape of hybrid work environments. Robinson points to offering a wide range of flexible childcare, elder care, and healthcare benefits to level the playing field for people with varying work schedules and varying degrees of working remotely. “Companies have been in this one-size-fits-all mode when it comes to benefits. We need to take a step back and think of the different personas we have, and what benefits actually align to optimize the various employee experiences.”

“There are a lot of folks who are frankly fatigued, and they’re burned out,” says Robinson, referencing the two-year pandemic. “So as DEI professionals and HR talent leaders, we have to make well-being a priority.” One step Bright Horizons took was to relaunch its employee assistance program and a new partnership with Spring Health that offers employees 24/7 support and unlimited access to a life coach and a navigator.–By Jennifer Haupt

How Your Culture of Inclusion Benefits the Communities You Serve 

The American Cancer Society (ACS) is a prime example of an organization with a DEI focus that aligns its internal culture with a campaign to address health disparities among marginalized groups. A big part of this non-profit’s mission is to improve the lives of cancer patients and their families. Thinking about that purpose through the lens of DEI means recognizing and addressing that many communities bear a disproportionate burden of cancer.

“We're working very diligently and intentionally to ensure that we’re developing initiatives and interventions that really get at critical issues around access to care, providing education and resources in ways that are culturally appropriate, and just being a presence in diverse and multicultural communities across the country,”said Tawana Thomas-Johnson, SVP and chief diversity officer at ACS, in a fireside chat with Spencer Whitney, digital editor at KQED in San Francisco, about how a culture of inclusion benefits the communities you serve.

According to Thomas-Johnson, the challenges she faces are deeply rooted in systemic racism and structural barriers that prevent equal access to health care for all. Addressing that inequity involves recognizing that communities are made up of different groups of people from all walks of life and backgrounds. That means looking at how to adapt interventions and strategies to make sure they are appropriate and relevant for different populations. It also involves developing a workforce of staff and volunteers that's reflective of the communities served.

Thomas-Johnson had the opportunity to sit down with the Reverend Jesse Jackson, Sr., when she first came to ACS. She asked him how to get into the Black community and help people really understand the importance of cancer screenings. His question to her was: Who can say it to them? Who should the messenger be?

A fireside chat on inclusion: moderator Spencer Whitney of KQED and Tawana Thomas-Johnson of The American Cancer Society

“One of the things we know is that when you use leaders from within the community, respected individuals, trusted messengers, the message is delivered and received in a way that’s very different than when it’s delivered by someone from outside of the community,” Thomas-Johnson said. She pointed out a shining example: ACS recently trained 2000 members of the Lynx Incorporated, a national African-American professional women’s organization, to serve as community health workers. These women at the height of their profession, who are dedicated to community service, are trusted and respected in communities that ACS typically wouldn't have access to. As a result, they can go into these communities to deliver ACS messaging around prevention and early detection of cancer.

Overcoming mistrust is just one piece of the puzzle. The other piece, according to Thomas-Johnson, is around provider education. “Our providers have to do better,” she said. “We've got to educate our clinicians; they’ve got to understand the populations that they're serving. We have to help them be more culturally competent, more sympathetic and empathetic and sensitive to the needs of people from different backgrounds. So, there's a lot that has to happen both at the clinical level with providers, but then also at the community level where you're trying to engender trust.”

Whitney asked about the problem of diversifying clinical trials. “The clinical trials piece is about education, both with the community and with the providers,” said Thomas-Johnson. “But it’s also about workforce. The more diverse researchers we have, the more we have a workforce that reflects the population that we’re trying to engage in clinical trials.” ACS has donated about $20 million in grants to medical schools at historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs), and the organization is also placing HBCU interns at the college level in ACS-supported labs across the country.

Thomas-Johnson concluded her conversation with Whitney by saying there are many barriers for marginalized communities in getting cancer care and treatment, including access to healthcare in their neighborhoods and transportation to treatment centers in other parts of town. “We're fortunate at the American Cancer Society that we're working in partnership with wonderful organizations,” she said. “We’re also addressing some of the barriers through the policy work that we do with our ACS Cancer Action Network, which is the legislative arm of the American Cancer Society.”–By Jennifer Haupt

A Road Map to Creating a More Diverse Future of Work

The world of HR is broad: people-and-culture professionals are responsible not just for hiring and firing, but employee engagement, employer brand management, learning and development, coaching, and especially now, retention.

In a Thought Leadership Spotlight at the conference, Zack Nunn, the director of diversity, inclusion and social impact for Momentive (formerly SurveyMonkey), talked about some of the key methods for ensuring success of another of HR responsibility: DEI.

It is a relatively new area for HR to venture into, he said, but one that is bringing increasing pressure to bear. It is coming not just from internal stakeholders like employees and potential employees, but also government regulators. Efforts in this area will have to be more transparent, and pledges will need to be shown to be more than words. People are also willing to go public when the words don’t match actions. “As you think about the workplace today, diversity and inclusion are the future of your workforce and culture,” Nunn said.

Nunn said there are some key elements of HR work, each of which can be instrumental in the success of a DEI program. “What is your talent acquisition plan?” he asked. “How do you differentiate it at different levels–for the entry-level talent, your junior executive, your C-suite level? The strategies will be different, but they need to be cohesive. You need to engage historically excluded groups in each aspect of your talent acquisition strategy.”

Job descriptions and messaging also need to be inclusive of a diverse talent pool. “Your messaging on your company website has to be clear so that people know what you s


RELATED STORIES

Using AI to Revolutionize Hiring for Top Talent

With the help of artificial intelligence, a task that would take hours, days, or even weeks to complete can now be done in five minutes, says Mike Aronson, senior director of talent acquisition at Johnson Controls.In talent acquisition, AI has been a useful tool in generating job descriptions, screening applicants, and sourcing candidates. During a panel at From Day One’s November virtual conference, executives touched on how AI has revolutionized hiring the best candidates and streamlined productivity.Balancing AI and Human OperationsLesli Stasiek, senior director of human resources at Cencora says that they maintain the “human touch” through the hiring process by still interacting through recruiters and hiring managers, while also using Phenom AI as a way to drive efficiency in filtering through applications on a daily basis. “We don’t have enough recruiters to go through everything, so we’re leveraging the AI at the top of the funnel,” said Stasiek.Cencora is still at the start of its journey with utilizing AI but Stasiek shares that she hopes it can be leveraged “internally to empower employees and give them the resources to build their careers and drive better discussions.”AI is being implemented into talent acquisition to quickly check off tedious tasks that may be taking up time that can be investing towards more productivity. When it comes to creating job postings, AI is also used to source the best candidates through algorithms within job boards. During the hiring process, AI minimizes the time recruiters spend on summarizing interview notes and conversations to provide to managers.“It’s not replacing the person. It’s making the job a bit easier so that they can have a conversation around why [they] think this person’s good,” said Aronson.Companies who use skills-based hiring processes also benefit from the efficiencies of using AI to filter through applications that match the best skill sets. Angie Lombardo, global director of operations for talent acquisition at Arcadis, says the company’s applicant tracking system has an AI that will help rank the talent pool based on skills.This tool is helpful in regions like India and the Middle East where they receive thousands of applications within a week of posting a job opportunity, says Lombardo.Mitigating Bias in AIAI functions through system memory and if human bias has already been incorporated, machines will learn to replicate the same bias. Jenny Cotie Kangas, director of talent-centered transformation at Eightfold, says that it’s important to understand how you’re using the AI, how it’s coded, and the necessary guardrails to prevent wrong decision making.“When we’re talking about job descriptions and leveraging [generative] AI for job descriptions, it’s always important to run that through some sort of anti-bias tool,” said Kangas. “We want to kind of reset and recalibrate and make sure that we’re creating job descriptions that are truly inclusive.”AI is useful in eliminating the natural human bias such as what Kangas describes as the decisions she’ll make when she’s really hungry and when she’s not. Generative AI tends to be more male leaning, she added. The system may also be seeking “charged words” to identify patterns from the past in order to predict next steps. Kangas adds that even when companies use tools like AI, it’s always important to layer other tools on top to make sure all pieces are being covered.Utilizing AI for Internal GrowthAI’s efficiency not only helps with sourcing applicants but it can also help identify current employees who are ready for development and growth as future leaders. Especially in organizations with thousands of employees, it’s almost impossible for managers to know every employee well enough to identify possible candidates.Lydia Dishman of Fast Company moderated the discussion among industry experts (photo by From Day One)“Tools like this allow us to look at not just career pathing within a function, but across multiple functions or business units,” said Stasiek. “You drive that connectivity and you drive that networking and then you can grow your pipeline and your succession planning exponentially.” Investing in the career development of current employees also increases engagement and retention.Tracking the Applicant ExperienceThe digital platform of AI, allows everything to be tracked and digitized for future data analysis. For example, hiring managers can see what questions candidates are asking a website’s embedded chatbot and understand what they are looking for and what problems need to be solved, says Aronson.The reason why websites like Amazon are visited so regularly is because it’s easy to use. Company pages should be emulating this simplicity to improve the candidate experience during application processes, he added.Especially with the culture of recruiters “ghosting,” improving the candidate experience is also a key aspect to attracting the best candidates, said Kristen Baller, head of talent acquisition at DISH Network. By using AI to cut down tedious tasks, recruiters have more time to focus on “engaging and partnering with the candidate throughout their journey,” she said.The Challenges of AIAI is a powerful tool within the corporate space and it’s now being used by more companies, but what challenges can rise with increased use?“I think education is what we’re going to have to really think about,” said Baller. “We’re giving all these teams a Ferrari but nobody’s taught them how to drive it.” Stasiek emphasized that education is important to create awareness, but change management is where leaders can really see the impact of implementing a new system.As we remember that AI is a machine, Lombardo points out that “the more that we use AI, we do have to be careful that we’re not just using AI to do our work, but we are putting that human touch on it before we put anything out to be viewed.”Jennifer Yoshikoshi is a local news and education reporter based in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Jennifer Yoshikoshi | December 11, 2024

Creating a Purposeful Workplace Experience

With the major threat of the pandemic behind us, the big question is unavoidable: should we all return to the office? If you feel like opinions are sharply divided, well, you’re right!“A recent survey from McKinsey found that 52% of employees prefer a mix of both: they love that hybrid workplace, valuing flexibility, but also recognize the benefits of working in person,” said moderator Lydia Dishman, senior editor for growth and engagement at Fast Company. “And research from Gallup shows that employees who feel engaged in their workplace are more likely to want to return to the office, particularly for team collaboration and relationship building.”Deloitte reports that organizations with a strong focus on employee experience see a productivity increase of up to 20% and it also helps with turnover rates. “Ultimately, it's up to the leaders to set the policy and model what the ideal workplace situation looks like,” Dishman said during an executive panel discussion at From Day One’s October virtual conference.Corporate leaders have been saying it a lot lately: We want to make the office a magnet, not a mandate. They can make that a reality by creating the kind of experience that re-engages workers with their leaders, their colleagues, and their roles. How can employers be intentional about the workplace as a welcoming community and place where workers can fulfill their need for connection and purpose, inclusion and belonging?Encouraging In-person InteractionIt can be hard to encourage in-person interaction, even when back in the office, when employees are plugged into a post-pandemic productivity mindset of sitting at a desk, powering through tasks, and then going home. Providing team leaders with additional support can help them facilitate the organic in-office interactions that so many of us have been missing.“We’re trying to guide leaders with tools. At CSL, we’ve just launched a series of tools called Moments That Matter,” said Kim Robbins, senior director, HR change and culture at CSL Behring. “It’s encouraging leaders to coach their teams about being intentional about the work that needs to happen.” The training helps them understand the difference between moments that require ‘heads down’ focus time alone in the office or at home vs. times when they should be providing face-to-face support, such as when onboarding new hires. “Could we be encouraging people to randomly meet for lunch or come together for events? We’ve positioned all this in a framework about planning the way you work, so that people could be intentional and do some assessments for who might be missing in their network that could really help them feel that greater sense of connectivity and belonging,” Robbins said.Executive panelists from JLL, HR Media & Co., CSL Behring, and Lam Research spoke about "Creating a Purposeful Workplace Experience" (photo by From Day One) Antoinette Hamilton, global head of inclusion & diversity at Lam Research, says that employee resource groups, which first came into prominence as a way to stay virtually connected during Covid, are now another structured way to encourage organic in-person interaction. ERG’s can “be a place to connect, meet some new people, and do something for a great cause,” Hamilton said.Taking an Empathetic Approach“Empathy is a foundational principle of making a workplace someplace you want to go to,” Dishman said. Much of empathy, says Judith Ojo, CEO of HR Media & Co., comes down to open communication. “Some employees are not fond of being in the office. Maybe they can’t get enough work done or they’re constantly interrupted,” Ojo said. Make sure you understand where your employees are coming from and what they are looking for, then respond in kind. For the issues Ojo noted, creating a quiet zone, collaboration space, or wellness area for meditation can go a long way to making an employee feel comfortable, seen, and supported. Such an adaptive workspace can be helpful for fostering inclusion.Empathy can mean different things for different people, and leaders need to be prepared to take the cue from the employees. “I think listening sessions are really important. The key is you’re not trying to solve the problem. You’re listening,” said Tina Leblanc, Ph.D., head of DEI, Americas at JLL. “You listen. You pause. You come up with a solution. And then go back and say, ‘What I heard was…And these are some ideas.’  And then also ask them, ‘What do you feel we can do as a team to be more inclusive?’ That way you’re not putting your own biases [onto it].” Regular employee surveys can encourage employees to come forward.Building the Ideal WorkplaceFor many employees, Dishman says, it seems like a hybrid environment is the ideal. But making organizations cohesive and productive in a hybrid setup can seem far easier on paper than it is in practice. “Building trust within hybrid teams is really crucial to ensure collaboration and productivity,” Hamilton said. Her team does this by leaning into their core values: clear communication, mutual trust and respect, and transparency. Her organization wants its teams to feel cared about, and have created a manager track with training that incorporates inclusive leadership.Senior leaders need to communicate goals and parameters, Dishman says, so that the office continues to be a hub of connection – and so that everyone doesn’t come into the office two days per week only to spend those days on Zoom. “One thing that we have is collaborative conversations, where we bring people throughout the whole office, and even in different buildings, together,” Leblanc said. The company also encourages group lunches on Mondays, coffee on Wednesdays, and desserts on Fridays. The key is to keep thinking, ‘How do I make this more enjoyable?’ to encourage people to get up, get dressed, and commute into work. Employees should leave feeling happy and productive, says Leblanc.Hamilton says managers should be given the tools to be able to articulate the benefits of on-site work. “You’ve failed if you walk into an office and everyone is on a Zoom call,” she said. “We have to be intentional about how we work differently when we come back into in-person environments,” she said. “Managers are the catalyst for getting that done in a consistent way across organizations.”Robbins’ office encourages employees to be intentional about their meetings and not jam their schedules unnecessarily through a collaboration audit. “Do you really need to still be a part of all these meetings? Could you just only attend when there’s an agenda topic relevant to you, where you're a subject matter expert or [the] person to move this goal forward? Or could you delegate it to a junior team member to give them exposure and have greater connectivity in the office?” she said.Her organization has also invited “puppy trucks” from local animal shelters to visit so employees can play with puppies during breaks. Such activities should feel organic, and companies must be careful to avoid scheduling what feels like “mandatory fun.” Again, employees will look to their leaders to set the tone, so managers should be the first ones to dive into activities and bring the team along, Leblanc says. Let them know attendance is optional, but if they do go, ask them to bring a friend. Such participation also makes senior leaders feel more accessible. “Humanize yourself,” Leblanc said.Katie Chambers is a freelance writer and award-winning communications executive with a lifelong commitment to supporting artists and advocating for inclusion. Her work has been seen in HuffPost and several printed essay collections, among others, and she has appeared on Cheddar News, iWomanTV, On New Jersey, and CBS New York.

Katie Chambers | November 20, 2024

Constant Change Is Bad for Business Because It’s Bad for Human Performance

In the corporate world, change is inevitable and organizations that can’t change don’t last long. Oftentimes, change is considered a good thing until you talk to people on the frontlines of it.“At some point you have to recognize that there is a contradiction between the simplistic idea that change is necessarily a good thing and the lived experience of change on the front lines, which seems to be anything but a good thing,” said Ashley Goodall, a leadership expert and author of The Problem With Change: And the Essential Nature of Human Performance.Goodall spoke with Vox's editorial director of tech, climate, and world teams, Bryan Walsh, at From Day One’s October virtual conference. They spoke about how to navigate constant change in the business world.Uncertainty, Control, and Work Without MeaningGoodall has had a long career in the corporate world as an HR executive, most recently at Cisco. He's seen major change from the outside and inside and identifies three key themes prevalent in any chaotic change. The first is uncertainty. “We don’t do very well when the future is uncertain and when somebody says there’s a big change coming, that’s almost the definition of uncertainty.”The next is control. “When you take away our sense of agency, we feel helpless. There’s a phenomenon called learned helplessness, where people just phone it in, because they’ve been trained by their environment that whatever they do won’t make that much of a difference.”Learned helplessness is the psychological name for a loss of control, Goodall says, but it also goes by another name. “Quiet quitting is probably pretty close in a business context for people saying, ‘Hey, I don't know what I do here. Why am I trying?’”Bryan Walsh of Vox interviewed author Ashley Goodall, left, during the fireside chat (photo by From Day One)The last theme is having a sense of meaning. “We have a desperate need for the world to make sense to us,” Goodall said. Organizational change often disrupts the essential social connections that define how people work and identify themselves. Shifting teams or altering org charts can dismantle these "social graphs," leaving employees struggling to adapt. On top of that, humans have an innate need to make sense of their environment. When conflicting messages about the organization’s direction emerge, employees often feel lost and disconnected, unable to contribute effectively.Goodall noted that while leaders often recognize these challenges, their focus tends to remain narrow—fixing one change initiative at a time. The issue arises when multiple initiatives, driven by different leaders or consultants, pile up, creating chaos. To address this, organizations must rethink change holistically and prioritize creating a work environment that supports human connection and meaningful contribution.“And it’s the aggregation of all of this that is really pernicious, which means that organizations need to think differently about change, and more broadly about the experience of work here every day, and does it support human contribution,” Goodall said."What can leadership do when it comes to actually executing change?” Walsh asked. Goodall says there needs to be a sliding scale to determine when change is necessary. “The first thing to say to organizational leadership is, do less. Change. But do less. If we get through our collective heads that this isn’t an unalloyed good, this is something that can create harm more than it creates good, then I think you pause and set the bar higher on organizational change.”This doesn’t always happen but leadership can be proactive about “turning the volume down,” he said.“You can involve employees in telling you where the volume currently is,” Goodall said. "What would happen if a leader came in and said, I’m going to spend the next few weeks learning everything that works really well here, or everything that we should preserve, or everything that’s valuable, or everything that’s special, or everything that you really care about, so that we know what to protect. And once we’ve understood that, then we can think about how to improve things.”Leaders can help employees navigate change by anchoring on stability and framing it as a clear, process-driven outcome, while taking steps to promote consistency amid the chaos of multiple initiatives.Stability is a Necessary Precondition for Improvement“You could say stability is kind of the opposite of change. What does that look like?” Walsh asked.Goodall distinguished between change and improvement, which he says aren’t the same things and given a choice between the two, people would choose improvement. “The thing that we’re chasing in all of this is improvement. Well, stability is a necessary precondition for improvement.”People struggling in an organization amidst a sea of instability don’t lend to improvement. Goodall believes that improvement and positive change come from team environments, where employees know what’s going on and are valued. “If we are able to stipulate that organizational value, organizational productivity, organizational innovation, organizational goodness comes from humans working together.”If you have the above, then you’ll have something like stability, Goodall says.“What does stability look like? Stability looks like I have space to figure out the best use of my time. I’m given some autonomy.” For Goodall, true stability at work comes from personal confidence, strong team dynamics, and leaders who foster meaningful connections and mutual support.Digging more into that predictability and stability, Goodall talked about his use of weekly all-hands meetings, something Walsh pointed out that, in his experience, executives tend to despise.Goodall did not spend a whole lot of time prepping for these meetings. Instead, he used them as a personnel barometer. “It was a conversation for the leadership team that everyone got to tune into and ask questions of us.”“What we were trying to solve was, if you know what’s going on, you have space, you have agency, [then] you have predictability. You get to see the people leading your organizations when they’re not on script–when they’re not following the talking points that the communications team has put together for the all hands," Goodall added.The meetings would start with slides of birthdays, service anniversaries, or something random with a photo to spark conversation or a laugh. Then they would move onto business, and different teams would simply talk about what they were working on, what was working for them, areas of difficulty and challenge, what was coming up in the future, and more.And making things weekly, instead of a few times a year, gives organizations the opportunity to handle change as it’s happening, according to Goodall. All of this is "profoundly stabilizing." “We did this every week for years and years, and it became an organizational ritual, and people still talk about it. All we were doing was ritualizing stability and explaining to people what was going on.”Matthew Koehler is a freelance journalist and licensed real estate agent based in Washington, DC. His work has appeared in Greater Greater Washington, The Washington Post, The Southwester, and Walking Cinema, among others.

Matthew Koehler | November 20, 2024