What a Five-Generation Workforce Means for You: The Myths and Realities

BY Lisa Jaffe | July 18, 2024

Nick, a senior manager in a global tech company based in Seattle, has worked with people of many different ages, both older and younger than him. His experience is increasingly typical in a workforce that spans five generations, a growing diversity of experience that provides the benefit of workers sharing wisdom across the ages, but also gives rise to problems like ageism–the bias against others based merely on their calendar age. Nick recently learned that one of his direct reports is notably older than Nick assumed. “At that moment, I realized that I had been thinking of him as less serious and more in need of guidance. I knew I had to examine my prejudices about age.”

This is the first time in history that such a rich mixture of people from their teens to their 80s are at work. But the implications for business are still being sorted out. In 2020, a Deloitte white paper reported that 70% of executives surveyed believed a multigenerational workforce was important for their organizations, but only 10% felt ready to lead one and understood how it might affect operations.

The widespread assumption has been that the generations are distinct enough in their affinities that they should be treated differently. In the Deloitte survey, more than half the respondents said they consider differences between the generations in designing operations and benefits 

But are these differences more perceived than real? Deloitte’s report cites the new concept of a “perennial” employee, or someone who transcends generational stereotypes.

As the Deloitte survey explains: “Why is generation becoming less relevant as a way to understand the workforce? The starting point is that careers have become more dynamic and complex, loosening the historic correlation between age and career progression. Rapid technological and organizational change means that workers must now reinvent themselves multiple times throughout their working lives; at the same time, the broader business culture has shifted to make it acceptable, sometimes even desirable, to promote younger individuals into leadership positions. The upshot is that 65-year-old interns can today be found working side by side with 25-year-old managers, calling into question the assumption that age is a reasonable proxy for understanding people’s workplace challenges and needs.”

A 2012 analysis of more than 20 studies supports this view, finding few generational differences in work-related variables like attitudes towards work or technology. Where they do exist, the differences can likely be attributed to variables other than age, like education level.

Yet ageism persists. In this story, the first in a three-part series, we'll be looking at how employers can confront this challenge by adopting more age-inclusive practices. There’s good reason to do so, since lack of trust between generations can create unnecessary competition and resentment, to the detriment of working relationships. One experiment found that negative beliefs about older people and how they adapt to new technology led to poorer training of those people. Another survey found that hiring managers view younger workers as having more relevant education and experience and being a better cultural fit with organizations. 

On the other side is a view that goes as far back as Socrates: young people are flighty, have a poor work ethic, or require constant praise from above. Stephane P. Francioli, Ph.D., a postdoctoral researcher at the Wharton School of Management, has made a study of “youngism” and found that when asked about age-related abuse or discrimination, younger workers report higher rates than bias related to sexual orientation, race, religion, or gender, he says. 

Could this be because they see the workplace as wholly unfair? No, he says. If that were true, younger workers would also complain about issues of racism, sexism, or anti-LGBTQIA+ actions at higher levels than other age groups. They don’t. 

Heather Tinsley-Fix is a Senior Advisor at AARP where she helps employers support a multigenerational workforce (company photo)

Pigeon-holing different groups can impair how teams work together, says Heather Tinsley-Fix, a senior advisor at AARP, whether it’s saying that older people are not flexible with new tech or younger people have no loyalty. “If someone was young and not tech savvy, they wouldn’t mention it, but if they are older, it gets attributed to age,” she said. “It's often just a knee-jerk reaction.”

Abuse and discrimination can take many forms. Younger workers may be asked to run personal errands outside of their job description, or handle on-call hours at night because they don’t have children to take care of. They may be denied flexible work arrangements that parents of young children are given because a manager doesn’t think young, childless employees will work as hard at home without supervision, says Francioli.

The problems that affect younger workers are often not addressed because they are not recognized legally, at least at the federal level. In the U.S., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act covers age discrimination in workers over 40, but can disregard other workers. 

Employers need to be careful not to encourage and reemphasize generational differences by organizing training according to age groups, like courses on how to manage millennials, helping older workers navigate technology, or how your Gen Z staff is different. “There is no scientific basis for any of this, it creates an us vs. them atmosphere, and encourages an in-group/out-group mentality,” Francioli said.

One other consideration is how people can project age-related perceptions onto others. An older worker, for example, may believe coworkers think he is slow to adapt to new work methodologies, when they may not feel that way at all. In fact, one study found that what people believed about other generations was usually positive. The outlier was what people thought of younger generations, though young people believed others’ perceptions of them were far more negative than the reality.

While putting stereotypes aside, there are still some age-related realities that employers should take into account. For example, companies can consider ergonomic factors when it comes to older workers, as well as developing support programs for staff members going through menopause. But assuming attitudinal characteristics of specific age groups and training workers based on those assumptions is often counterproductive.

At the same time, the world is changing fast, so generations are experiencing factors like media and economic conditions in different ways, which shouldn’t be overlooked, says Corey Seemiller, Ph.D., a professor at Ohio’s Wright State University, and author of several books about Gen Z. Understanding those differences can be key to engaging with team members and the future success of your organization. She points to Gen Z, the social media generation, and their comfort with video as a form of communication. “Do you offer the opportunity for them to provide a video resume? Not all of them will, but some might prefer it,” she said.

Many in Gen Z are uninterested in public accolades for their work; some actively dislike it, Seemiller says. Similarly, those from Gen X, often called the Latch-Key Generation, experienced a lot of freedom during their childhood and are often averse to micromanagement.

Knowing what might discourage different generations and meeting them where they are doesn’t make you ageist. But if, for example, you note that older people who worked in an analog culture for most of their careers are having trouble adapting to a new tech platform and subsequently require special training for all people over 50, Seemiller says, that is when it becomes discriminatory. 

The best way to support the different needs of employees is to talk to them and treat them as individuals, advises Seemiller. Employers should find out what they want, what they need, and where there is room for improvement. Regular surveys are a good way to do this.  

All of this can be highly nuanced, but for employers, it will be worth the effort. We are experiencing a great age shift in the workforce. The UN estimates more than a third of the population will be over 65 by 2050. In the U.S., one-fifth of the population will be over 65 by 2030. Better health, and better healthcare, as well as economic circumstances, have led to people working longer. At the same time, the birth rate is declining.

Is your organization prepared for fewer younger workers and more older workers? How can you create a culture where ageism and prejudice against anyone, young or old, doesn’t gain a foothold? How can you harness the power of a multigenerational workforce? 

In part two of this series, we’ll provide actionable ideas and examples of programs that have helped other organizations successfully navigate changing demographics.

Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, AARP, for sponsoring this story, the first in a series on how employers can foster age inclusion in the workplace. Interested in assessing how you are doing with age inclusion–and learning more? Try AARP’s new tool, Age Inclusion 101. Just send an email to employerpledge@aarp.org, with the subject line betatest.

Lisa Jaffe is a freelance writer who lives in Seattle with her son and a very needy rescue dog named Ellie Bee. She enjoys reading, long walks on the beach, and trying to get better at ceramics.

 


RELATED STORIES

People-First, Performance-Focused: Linking HR Efforts to Bottom-Line Success

Despite HR’s new and powerful place in business, many leaders concerned with the bottom line struggle to understand the return on investment for HR’s activities, and many in HR struggle to communicate their value. But bridging human resources to the business isn’t an impossible task; in fact, it’s getting easier thanks to sophisticated HR tech and new access the department has to business leaders and their goals.Ken Matos, the director of marketing insights, and Keren Kozar, senior people and culture officer at HR tech platform HiBob says that the best way to make the connection is with what they call people-first HR.“People coming into the workforce are expecting a leader who genuinely cares about them and genuinely wants to see them be successful in the workplace,” said Kozar in a From Day One webinar on linking HR strategy to the bottom line. “[People-first HR] means that you’re considering your people. They’re not just a number.”“Every single department wants to contribute to a thriving company,” she said, but that may mean different things to different people. “For some, that 100% means the bottom line. For some people, that’s going to mean having an industry-disrupting product, but at the end of the day, happy, engaged employees who feel like they are contributing to an organization that cares about them are going to be the most successful, and that’s how a company is going to thrive.”The Latest and Greatest Business Expense: Artificial IntelligenceCompanies are cutting big checks for artificial intelligence–powered tools and all their promises, and entire organizations are receiving directives from the top: Start using artificial intelligence. But there’s little direction about how to use it, and the tech is still new to many users. Even without detail, departments will be asked to report how it’s improving their work.Ken Matos, Ph.D., the director of market insights at HiBob spoke during the webinar (company photo)Treat AI like a hypothesis to be tested, said Matos. “The first thing is to understand your theory of change for AI.” Identify the problems you believe an AI tool will solve, and “once you have that, you can move on to measurement.” Measure whether people are using it, then track how they’re using it and what they’re producing. “If you know what that chain is supposed to look like, you can pick key places where there are doubts or possibility for failure and focus on measuring those bits. And if the end result is what you’re looking for, then odds are that the whole thing worked.”Linking HR to the Bottom LineIf you want to get business leaders to listen, find out what motivates them. If they want to increase revenue, then it’s your job to identify how people affect revenue with not just what they do, but how they do it.“You can articulate to a leader that you want to get sales revenue up, and here are a bunch of enablers, or obstacles,” Matos said. “My job is to make sure those enablers are maximized. Here’s how and how these obstacles are removed.” With that, those business leaders will start seeing you as an ally, not an admin.And if you’re going to vouch for the efficacy of HR and its work, then you have to speak the language of the business. Kozar once worked for a company where the leader was “100% a numbers guy” who cared only about the balance sheet. “He used to say, ‘HR, you’re so touchy feely.’ And my response would be, ‘people are a measurable metric. They matter. That is a data point. People’s feelings are actually a data point. You need to consider it, just like you would consider absolutely any other analytic that factors into your business decision.’”This can’t end with employee sentiment surveys, though. “We often talk about how to align with leaders and how to communicate with them, but it’s just as important to make sure that HR leaders are speaking to every level of the business,” she said. “So talk to individual contributors, your entry-level folks. The best feedback that I get is from the individual contributors and entry-level people that I’m just sitting with at lunch. That’s how I’m going to synthesize anecdotal feedback and deliver that back to leaders in a way that they’re not going to get through an engagement survey.”Those who chafe against the notion of people-first HR do so because they “don’t realize how feelings change the effectiveness of their business,” said Matos. Think of it this way: How many times have you avoided emails or a project because there’s a person on your team who slows down the work, or is simply a pain to work with?Matos often speaks to business leaders who wonder why it’s their responsibility to motivate the workforce. Maybe you can’t motivate them, he said, but you can certainly demotivate them. “You can strip away their natural desire to do their job, from micromanaging to disrespect to not being communicative. All of these are things under your control.”Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, HiBob, for sponsoring this webinar.Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza is an independent journalist and From Day One contributing editor who writes about business and the world of work. Her work has appeared in the Economist, the BBC, The Washington Post, Inc., and Business Insider, among others. She is the recipient of a Virginia Press Association award for business and financial journalism. 

Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza | January 31, 2025

Benefits Recap & Forecast: Navigating Alternative Health Plan Choices in 2025

On a summer day in 2024, Matt Cook, chief commercial officer of Firefly Health, suddenly felt some pain in his stomach. He reached out to his Firefly care team and scheduled a 15 minute appointment with a nurse practitioner who ordered him to get a CT scan. The results showed Cook had appendicitis and the next day he was scheduled for a surgery. All of this happened within 72 hours of care.Firefly Health is a virtual-first healthcare company that offers an alternative health plan that aims to make it easier for people to get the care they need. During a From Day One webinar, journalist Jenny Sucov spoke with Cook and Erik Sossa, independent advisor and consultant to Firefly and former Vice President of Global Benefits and Wellness at PepsiCo about health plan trends and challenges employers face with the changing landscape for benefits.The Shortfalls of Typical Healthcare BenefitsWhile Sossa was working with PepsiCo., he felt that employers were leaving employees to manage their benefits on their own. “They had to deal with changes in annual enrollment, finding an in network provider, prior authorization and an explanation of benefits,” he said.Despite the value of healthcare benefits, corporations are taking away from the positive employee experience while they themselves are struggling with the cost of providing care for their workers. “Employees oftentimes are facing the brunt of some of those tough decisions in the form of maybe a more restricted plan,” said Cook. “Affordability is such an issue for both the employee and employers themselves.”Coming from the corporate side, Sossa acknowledges that companies struggle with cost sharing and sometimes burden employees with having to educate themselves on healthcare plans while they may not have the time to learn the ins and outs of health insurance.“For an employee who doesn’t navigate healthcare for a living, they serve our companies for a living, that’s a tremendous burden on them to try to navigate through this,” said Sossa. “That’s part of the dynamic and one of the things I’m very excited about with companies like Firefly that are trying to really change that paradigm.”Matt Cook, the chief commercial officer of Firefly Health, spoke during the webinar (company photo)Cook said that one group that launched Firefly’s health plan alongside traditional plans told them that Firefly was “the first plan they ever offered where frontline workers and executives alike chose the same plan.” The concept of healthcare affordability is not just with money, but also time. For busy workers, healthcare is only useful when it can be accessible according to the member’s schedule.What is Alternative Healthcare?Alternative health care is an alternative to “historical medical plans that have been delivered in this country across a consolidated set of health plans that are out there today,” said Cook.Firefly is trying to “rethink” the medical plan experience by taking off the burden that has been placed on employees. Sossa views it as the “next evolution” of healthcare. “It’s an alternative to a broken system but hopefully that alternative becomes more and more of the status quo as we rethink the way healthcare needs to be delivered in this country,” Cook said.The new generation of healthcare that Sossa envisions is one that is affordable, accountable, productive and healthy. Firefly is using industry wide data sets on wellness, prescription drugs and labs to understand the gaps that need to be filled in healthcare.Firefly’s model allows patients to quickly schedule a 15 minute visit and continue the engagement in between visits. The company found that there were more longitudinal engagements with its members that were dealing with chronic conditions, some of which they were seeing two dozen to 100 times a year. In a primary care system, they might be visiting their doctor once a year, said Cook.The company offers both virtual and in person care through local partnerships. Firefly uses a care model that ensures members are consistently met with the same team throughout their journey.Pitching New Programs to StakeholdersChanges in new programs, like healthcare, can be exciting but it has to be approved by company stakeholders in order to be implemented. Sossa said when something new is being pitched, you have to have a “clear understanding of your audience and speak their language.”When talking to the CFO, understand the marketing, investments and advertising aspects. When discussing with human resources, touch on the represented population, labor landscape and contracts. Sossa says stakeholders will be more receptive to ideas that are half-baked, ones that require some brainstorming.“Bring them the idea at a 30% mark, where you have the ability to sonar ping with them, get their influence and get their reaction. But if you have a chance to sonar ping your ideas as you go through, that makes them part of developing the solution, and they are much more receptive to that,” Sossa added.He encourages corporate leaders to “resist the gravitational forces of short term thinking” and consider how something that will be sustainable and will solve issues takes time. Sossa advises his clients to think of themselves as moving into the first year of a three year strategy. “Aim a little higher in your steering,” he said.The Future of HealthcareAlternative healthcare is at an inflection point, but it is still a slow progressing industry as they introduce the concept to the corporate world, says Sossa. Cook added that the inflection comes at a time where provider shortages are only getting worse.“Ultimately, the average person is going to be looking for that accessible, high quality care and I think that moment is coming. We need to bring great quality care to our people, not leave it to them to go and figure out where to find it,” said Cook.More competitors are entering the alternative health care industry and the adoption of it is going to increase in 2025, predicts Sossa. Especially with growing frustrations on the traditional healthcare models and lack of progression to meet members’ needs.Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, Firefly Health, for sponsoring this webinar. Jennifer Yoshikoshi is a local news and education reporter based in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Jennifer Yoshikoshi | January 27, 2025

Is It Time to Break Up With Your HR Tech?

Looking into new technology always takes time to research and adopt, but organizations should not put it off simply because it’s a lot of work. “There is constant evolution of technology,” said JJ Carpenter, senior account executive at Rippling, a platform designed to streamline HR, IT, and financial processes. “There are different systems out there today that maybe didn’t fit your bill a year ago.”Carpenter spoke about HR tech at From Day One’s November virtual, offering suggestions on how to approach new tech that could potentially make a big impact on how a company functions.Could it be time to shop around for new tech? HR technology should be evaluated regularly—typically every two to three years, though some companies do so annually, Carpenter says—to determine if it still meets organizational needs. Key triggers for evaluation include disconnected or inefficient systems, workarounds or manual data entry, duplicate processes, and the use of multiple unintegrated systems.Rather than sticking with outdated methods, organizations should stay informed about new solutions that may better fit their needs. Technology evolves, and what wasn’t a good fit before might be now. Regularly exploring options ensures HR systems remain effective and efficient. He spoke on what to look for in HR tech. Excerpts:Manual vs. AutomationOne of the most critical considerations is automation, as many HR tasks are still manual, creating inefficiencies and an increased administrative burden. Carpenter suggests evaluating HR tech with these questions: Are processes still paper-based? Do approvals require physical sign-offs? Is duplicate data entry a recurring issue? Can workflows be automated to reduce human intervention?A robust HR tech solution should provide automation that improves efficiency, reduces errors, and maintains an audit trail for tracking and reporting. “You don’t want employees to fall between the cracks,” Carpenter added. “Otherwise, they’ll get online and start looking at other companies. You want to try to retain those employees, that talent.”Organizations should evaluate whether their current system requires excessive manual input and whether automation can streamline transitions, promotions, and other workforce changes. Company BackgroundUnderstanding the history, structure, and direction of an HR tech provider is essential. In addition to evaluating present-day features, it’s important to consider the long-term partnership potential. Key questions to ask include: Is the system natively built, or is it a collection of acquired tools? Do different modules integrate seamlessly, or are they patched together? How often does the provider update and improve its technology? What does the provider’s roadmap look like for the future? JJ Carpenter a senior account executive at Rippling led the thought leadership spotlight (company photo)A well-integrated system helps prevent hidden inefficiencies that could impact long-term usability. Forward-thinking organizations should also assess the provider’s approach to AI development, security, and legal frameworks, including: Are AI-driven features being developed, and how will they impact HR teams? What data security measures are in place for AI functionalities? How does the provider handle contracts, including annual increases and master service agreements (MSAs)?Assessing these factors upfront ensures alignment between the HR tech provider and an organization’s strategic goals, Carpenter says.User-Friendly InterfaceEase of use is a major factor in the success of any HR tech platform. If employees and HR teams struggle to navigate the system, adoption rates will suffer. “Once we have a tool, will people actually use it? The worst thing you can do is invest in a tool you think solves a problem, only to find it creates a whole new one.”A user-friendly system reduces frustration, accelerates onboarding, and ensures employees and administrators can leverage its full capabilities without excessive training. Carpenter suggested not just asking if a function exists—ask the provider to demonstrate it.Test the TechBefore committing to an HR tech solution, it’s important to test it firsthand. Carpenter urged companies to request a sandbox environment to explore features, a demo showcasing real-world scenarios, and opportunities for HR teams to interact with the platform before implementation.“It’s got to be something that’s going to take away your burden, or at least help mitigate it,” he said.Reporting CapabilitiesData-driven decision-making is a cornerstone of effective HR management, and a strong HR tech solution should provide robust reporting capabilities, including customizable reports on workforce trends, compliance tracking for various regulations, easy export options for integration with analytics tools like Tableau or Power BI, and visibility into key HR metrics across multiple locations and entities.Organizations should ensure their HR tech allows them to track performance, generate insights, and make strategic decisions efficiently. “You want to focus on reducing your admin time and increasing your strategy, which boosts productivity,” Carpenter said.Customer Service & Response TimeReliable customer support is crucial when issues arise, as employee hours are valuable, and HR tech should build efficiency—not create more work while users sit on hold. When evaluating HR tech providers, consider Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for response times, Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) scores and user reviews, the availability of self-service options, and dedicated support models, such as pod-based support teams.A provider with strong customer support ensures that technical issues and inquiries are addressed promptly, minimizing disruptions to HR operations.Return on Investment & Management Buy-in“Sometimes other parties need to be involved more than you initially expect. Typically, you might start with an HR evaluation and realize IT needs to be part of the discussion, especially for security concerns,” Carpenter said.Look for tools that provide documentation, ISO and SOC certifications, and transparency around their security measures. These aspects are critical when presenting to leadership or a board.A strong business case for new HR tech should include time savings, as manual tasks consume valuable hours that translate into salary costs; administrative costs, since excessive administrative work reduces strategic focus and profitability; and long-term efficiency, as reducing manual work improves overall productivity and operational effectiveness.To build a persuasive case, outline the problem, the cost of inaction, and the benefits of the new solution. Decision-makers will weigh factors such as implementation time, cost, ROI, and associated risks.Effective evaluation involves a phased approach, system consolidation, and change management to ensure a smooth transition. Testing before implementation is crucial to preventing unforeseen challenges. In the end, making a well-informed decision based on both current and future needs will set an organization up for long-term success. “There is a cost to change,” Carpenter told attendees, “but there’s also a reward if you make the right decision.”Investing in the right solution can drive efficiency, improve compliance, and enhance the employee experience. By focusing on automation, company background, usability, testing, reporting, support, and ROI, organizations can make a smarter, more strategic decision that scales with growth.Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, Rippling, for sponsoring this thought leadership spotlight. Carrie Snider is a Phoenix-based journalist and marketing copywriter.

Carrie Snider | January 24, 2025