How Behavioral Science and ‘Nudge Theory’ Can Make a Difference in Gender Equality

BY Jenic Mantashian | November 05, 2019

Since humans are creatures of habit and tradition, they’ll tend to keep doing what they’re doing until something motivates them to change. Individuals may change their behavior for reasons particular to them, but what if leaders in business or government want to solve problems by encouraging change across a whole group of people? The thriving field of behavioral science has produced a wealth of insights in how to “nudge” people with gentle pushes that can add up to a big impact. Behavioral-science firm the BVA Nudge Unit is a global consultancy that helps clients ranging from Air France to the World Wildlife Fund to create sustainable change, both inside and outside their organizations. In an interview with From Day One, we asked Jenic Mantashian, Executive Vice President of the BVA Nudge Unit USA, about her company’s work in the field. Excerpts:

From Day One: Your organization recently helped the U.N. to engage 1 billion men in the cause of gender equality using behavioral science. That's a lot of people to sway. To start with, can you tell us about behavioral science as a field and give us some examples of its insights and tools?

Mantashian: Behavioral science is a field of study that brings together several disciplines, among them cognitive science, social psychology and behavioral economics.  In very simple terms, behavioral science seeks to understand the true drivers of human behavior.

As a consulting practice it’s a relatively new field, but has really taken off.  There have been several Nobel Prizes awarded to people for their work in behavioral science, as more and more people see its value for solving problems. Specifically, as a practice, it uncovers the cognitive biases, emotional and social influences, and the impact of context on our behavior. With those insights, we can pursue informed strategies to resolve what are otherwise intractable problems.

Some of the most well-known areas where applied behavioral science has emerged as a practice was in consumer finance and global health. Specifically, through the application of nudges, individuals were successfully encouraged to save more money for retirement and to vaccinate their children, respectively.

How do you define "nudge," as you deploy it among a particular group?

I should mention that the term “nudge” was coined by two leaders in this field, Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein.   In fact, they wrote the book on it–Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness.

The way I explain a nudge to people is that it is a small discrete intervention that is inspired by insights uncovered through our understanding of human behavior. It guides beneficial behaviors in such a way whereby choice is not limited, so people don’t feel forced.  Nudges can be carried out through changes to a physical space, by communicating in an intentional way, or simply by including behavioral strategies within any interaction with a group or individual.  For example, you can nudge employee behaviors in a meeting simply by being very deliberate about the name of the meeting room or the title of your meeting–in effect, priming the participants.

Jenic Mantashian is Executive Vice President of the BVA Nudge Unit USA

What is HeForShe, the movement you supported for the U.S., and what are some of the behaviors it seeks to address?

HeForShe is a solidarity campaign initiated by the U.N. for the global advancement of gender equality.  The movement invites men specifically, and people of all gender identifications, to stand in solidarity with women to create a brave, visible, and united force for gender equality.

From a behavioral perspective, as a first step, HeForShe “pre-engages” with men by gaining their commitment. They’re persuaded to sign up to be part of the movement on HeForShe.org. As a second step, HeForShe encourages those registered to take action in favor of gender equality within their own communities.

Naturally the specific behaviors are quite broad and varied, since each country and context is so different. The subjects of the nudges could range from heads of state, who have the ability to change laws related to pay equality, all the way to university students, who have the ability to foster a campus environment where women are safe from sexual assault.

Why is there a need to deploy behavioral science to influence these ingrained behaviors, rather than more traditional methods like public-service advertising?

I would start off by saying that giving people information is essential. Information helps establish an intent. Without an intent to act a certain way, it’s hard to make it happen.

With that said, time and again we have seen that information is simply not enough to change behavior. For example, we know that eating sugar and processed foods on a regular basis can lead to diabetes. We know that smoking cigarettes can lead to cancer.  We know that driving and texting can lead to fatal accidents. There is so much information out there on these topics, but millions of people still engage in these deadly behaviors.

What behavioral science and nudges allow us to do is complement the information we receive, so we can take a more comprehensive approach. For example, next time I have a craving for sweets, if I made changes to my kitchen environment that nudged me away from the cookies and nudged me towards the fruit, it will support me better with my intent to eat healthier.

Can you explain the use of commitment as a step toward change, and why it proves effective?’

We know from many experiments in our field that when someone commits to a future behavior, they are more likely to do it. For example, in one experiment, hotel guests were asked for a pre-commitment to reuse towels to support eco-friendly behavior at the hotel, and by simply having people check a box, there was a 25% average increase in the reuse of towels. It is believed by some that engaging in the commitment dissolves any cognitive dissonance that results from not following through on the committed action. And since humans look for ways to avoid discomfort, we are more likely to follow through with the action to avoid the guilt or conflict that can arise.

In a recent article, you identified many "drivers of influence." Could you offer a couple of prime examples?

Sure. At the BVA Nudge Unit, we created a tool that we coined the 21 Drivers of Influence.  The tool isolates 21 of the most powerful heuristic-based levers, from more than 200 that have been identified in the field, that can be used to amplify the effectiveness of specific activations. In other words, they serve as behavioral science-based inspirations that drive our ideation process when we design strategies and nudges to change behavior.

Commitment is one of those drivers. Another popular one is “Social Norms,” where we exploit the insight that people want to feel a sense of belonging and thus will be more likely to act in a way that’s like the rest of the group. If you look at Amazon, they use this driver very well, by showing you the popularity of a product, along with its ratings and endorsements by others. Another one is “Easiness,” which is the understanding that we are more likely to do something if it’s undemanding. That’s what Amazon was thinking in designing their “one click” check-out option.

You also talk about "stairs of change." Could you describe the process?

At the BVA Nudge Unit we have a proprietary behavioral framework that’s a step-wise process that inspires the development of behavioral science strategies and nudges. The best way to think about our Stairs of Change is to imagine you are climbing up four stories of a building, where each of the four stories represents an important stage. As you ascend to the top, you get closer to achieving your end goal.  However, if any of the steps are skipped haphazardly, you risk the collapse of your effort.

In other words, we break down the steps to the behavior into four areas and work on each of them. At the step “Preparing the Field,” we think about how to awaken the attention of our target, such as finding the right time, place and messenger. We take this through to “Reinforce the Behavior,” where we think about things like providing reassurance through feedback, recognizing the behavior through rewards, and activating social diffusion.

What kinds of results are you seeing from such programs, for example your work with the HeForShe movement?

The results have been very positive. Our primary focus with the U.N. was to nudge the commitment process, getting men to commit to the movement. Shortly after our interventions were launched, using analytics from HeForShe.org, it was determined that commitments jumped from 2% to 25% conversions among website visitors.

We’re also now working with HeForShe Champion corporations on the application of nudge within their organizations. Among other steps, they’re optimizing recruitment and hiring practices through the use of our frameworks in order to ensure gender-balanced workforces in specific sectors, along with achieving a more diverse workforce overall. We are in the testing phase and hope to share the good results soon.

What are some other examples from behavioral science in fostering diversity and gender equality, particularly in the corporate sector?

There are a lot of published examples out there and a good resource to access many of them can be found in our book called Nudge Management. Nudges can be put in place to encourage D&I at all stages of the employee experience. Let me give you some examples:

When hiring: In advertisements, only list requirements that are key to the position. Research has shown that there are trends in the way specific groups respond to job advertisements. For instance, women tend to apply only when they feel they meet 100% of the required capabilities on a job advertisement, while men are likely to apply when they meet only 60%of those qualifications.

To debias annual reviews: At a mid-size U.S. tech company, the annual-review process involved managers discussing staff performance. Comments were largely about employees’ personalities rather than their actual work, and included various stereotypes. A study showed that 14% women were criticized for being too aggressive, 8% of men were criticized for being “too soft.”  The company initiated an employee scorecard which focused on the work output and its impact on the business and not the individual. The result? A year after rolling out new scorecard, none of the women were criticized for being too aggressive, and less than 1% of men were criticized for being “too soft.”

To increase diversity in global job assignments: An international assignment is often seen as a crucial step in a successful career in large organizations. But not many women declare themselves open to international mobility. In a global company, simply rephrasing the question on an employee-development questionnaire–from “are you internationally mobile?” to “would you consider an international assignment sometime in the future?”—led to a 25% increase the number of women declaring they were mobile, and thus candidates for further management development.

That said, it’s important to note that these methods don’t necessarily work in every situation. Contexts change how people behave. That’s why ad-hoc solutions are generally recommended.

Looking ahead, what other problems are you aiming to address by wielding behavioral science?

Basically, any problems that exist where there are humans involved, we want to be there to support positive change. On the Nudge Management side, when nudging within organizations, this can range from encouraging entrepreneurial behavior among sales reps and the adoption of new sales automation platforms, to promoting compliance with safety rules and regulations, to adopting behavior that supports communication or innovation.    More broadly, we also are working on using behavioral science to improve customer experience, to adopt sustainable behavior, and promote the quality of life and standard of living in cities.

Editor’s Note: BVA Nudge Unit USA is a sponsor of From Day One. The author of this article can be reached at jenic.mantashian@bvanudgeunit.com  


RELATED STORIES

A Decade of Change: The Evolution of Employee Experience

When people feel like they have an impact in the work, when they feel valued and respected, they’re more likely to be happier and more engaged employees. The need for agency is something the management consultancy United Minds has been monitoring closely, and it’s what they believe will play a significant role in workplace engagement and satisfaction in the coming years.United Minds has been tracking employee sentiment for a decade. Their first survey, taken back in 2014, focused on the emerging notion of employee advocacy. Today, that’s part and parcel of the workplace. Though they’ve added or subtracted questions over the years, the goal has always been the same: to understand how sentiment is changing across the global workforce.In 2024, “we were really curious to see, given what’s happened in the last five years, how these expectations have shifted,” said Anthea Hoyle, managing director, North America, at United Minds during a From Day One webinar. The good news is, Hoyle and her team found that workplace sentiments have improved. Overall, employees are happier with pay and with benefits, and they’re more likely than in the past to feel connected to company leadership. “Everything that leaders, communicators, and HR professionals have been doing in the last few years to improve people’s experiences of work seems to be working.”For instance, almost three-quarters of respondents told the firm that people in their workplace treat each other with civility and respect, and 70% say they’re able to balance work priorities and personal life. As the employee experience improves, so do employee expectations, Hoyle said. “The bar keeps getting higher, and as we’ve seen in the last few years, there is greater  awareness of the role that employers play in people’s lives, the types of experiences people want from work, and the expectations people have of employers to make these changes possible.”Among those higher expectations is that employees want to work for organizations that trust them to act independently. Employees who feel they have agency are more likely to be satisfied at work, more likely to advocate for their employer outside of work, and more likely to stick around. There are four levers employers can pull to improve the employee experience and agency, said Ellyn Michalak, senior principal at the firm.Journalist Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza moderated the session about "A Decade of Change: The Evolution of Employee Experience" with leaders from United MindsFirst, a strong company reputation matters. “In the external world, your company has a positive reputation on what they’re doing to impact society. That really helps employees feel a strong sense of connection to you as an employer,” Michalak said.Secondly, encouraging supportive managers is important. Avoid the “frozen middle,” said Michalak, describing managers that can, inadvertently or not, stunt progress within an organization. They need to connect with their employee base. “If you can crack that direct manager nugget, you’re looking at employees feeling more valued. They will agree that their employer cares more about health and well-being because they have that direct access to their managers.”Third, leaders at the top need to set the tone for a healthy culture, which can then spread to the rest of the organization. And finally, Michalak said, link all of these goals with consistent communication. Those who unify their strategies with communication “can move the needle on mental health and well-being and employees perceiving how well the company is doing.” If they do, she explained, “morale is likely to be higher.”If your end-of-year surveys are painting a different picture of employee sentiment in your organization–maybe one that’s not so rosy–it’s not necessarily cause for alarm. Employers just need to figure out why they’re bucking the trends. The root cause may be obvious, like recent layoffs, a company acquisition, a change in leadership, or just a struggling sector. “All of these things have a big impact on people’s day-to-day working lives and feelings of commitment and certainty,” Hoyle said.If the results aren’t what you want them to be, identify where you want to land at the end of 2025 and then lean into the four pillars: “Equip your managers to really drive that feeling of having people feel like they’re making an impact.” Hoyle said. “Partner with your communications teams and bring home those stories of people making an impact and really generating that sense of pride. And make sure that people feel rewarded and recognized.”Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, United Minds, for sponsoring this webinar. Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza is a freelance journalist and From Day One contributing editor who writes about work, the job market, and women’s experiences in the workplace. Her work has appeared in the Economist, the BBC, The Washington Post, Quartz, Business Insider, Fast Company, and Digiday’s Worklife.

Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza | December 13, 2024

Developing Workforce Culture Skills to Thrive in 2025

Emtrain’s 2024 report, “Workplace Culture in 2024 and What It Signals for 2025,” recorded that that there was a 4% increase in people’s experiences on respect, inclusion and belonging in the workplace but a 5% decrease in people’s perceptions of the personal integrity and integrity of their leaders. What does this data tell us?During a thought leadership spotlight at From Day One’s Brooklyn conference, founder and CEO of Emtrain, Janine Yancey presented how businesses can effectively use a culture survey to gain better insights on how employees are doing and how to prepare for the future as the industry evolves.With an uptick in major layoffs across corporations, Yancey says that the boosted numbers in experiences of respect and belonging come from those who were chosen to stay amid layoffs, but the decrease in people’s perception of integrity in leaders come from increasing doubt about leaders making impactful decisions.“Employees right now are heavily doubting and distrustful of their leaders,” said Yancey. “We’ve got a society that’s more polarized than it really has been in decades. We’ve got so many people all working side by side.”Corporations have become more diverse over the last five years with a multigenerational, multicultural and mulitracial staff. These changes call for a stronger need to understand the social dynamics within a workplace.The long existing human capital metric tells businesses the basic information of total staff, demographics and promotion rates but what lacks in this measurement is the social dynamics between employees. Yancey says implementing a social capital metric can measure culture skills within a company which can show how people interact, collaborate, and work through changes.Janine Yancey of Emtrain led the thought leadership spotlight All of these metrics show what exists today, but they can also show what can be expected in the future, says Yancey. “Our ability and our skill to mitigate biases, all of those skills at the individual level, coworker level, team level and enterprise level, they are all skills that tell you what kind of social dynamics and outcomes you’re going to have,” she said.Yancey, as a former litigator, said all of her harassment and discrimination cases reflected “weak skills in managing power.” By measuring and evaluating how employees perceive the culture skills of their coworkers and manager under the umbrella of respect, inclusion, belonging and ethics, business leaders can predict what they can expect from their employees.Emtrain’s culture survey measures 16 different culture skills including mitigating bias, ensuring equity, fostering curiosity, advancing allyship, authenticity, nurturing trust and accountability.The data collected from these surveys reflect what would be learned in a one on one conversation but in an “automated, scalable way.” Results can show who’s displaying strong skills and who could benefit from more coaching and development.“We need to think about honing in and developing the culture skills of everyone, team members, direct managers, leaders, and focusing everyone  on developing and measuring those skills, because that's going to be basically the shock absorbers that's going to carry us through navigating through different and uncertain economic times,” Yancey said.She encourages leaders to take actions towards restoring and building trust with their employees to show them that they can be confident in their leaders.Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, Emtrain, for sponsoring this thought leadership spotlight.Jennifer Yoshikoshi is a local news and education reporter based in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Jennifer Yoshikoshi | December 10, 2024

HR’s Influence on Revenue: Navigating the New Employer-Employee Relationship

Successful organizations that consistently exceed revenue goals thrive by aligning with employee expectations .A thriving company nurtures the employee journey, focusing on various aspects of well-being and engagement to support personal and professional growth.This puts HR leaders at the forefront of helping employers and employees form an evolved relationship where their respective professional goals are more compassionately and collaboratively achieved.During a thought leadership spotlight at From Day One’s Austin conference R.W. Holleman, head of enterprise sales at Rain, a company offering earned wage access programs to employers, spoke on how a holistically symbiotic relationship between employee and employer is crucial to achieving higher revenue goals.Cultivating Authentic Value“We all know the cost of turnover. The impact of disengaged employees and the ripple effect that has on the bottom line, right?” Holleman asked the audience. He elaborated on how companies failing to address the root of modern-day disengagement see a cultural decline that further leads to a decline in revenue.Employees are no longer satisfied with just a paycheck and guaranteed work hours. They seek meaningful support, recognition of their value, and a sense of purpose in their work. Consequently, HR executives confront the limits of traditional talent management. The conventional view that employees are satisfied with consistent financial compensation and set work hours alone is outdated.“You’re not just managing people. You’re shaping your HR and you’re shaping the future of the business,” Holleman said. “If you don’t help with that, the business might not survive, right?”What can employers provide of authentic value? Holleman cited security, flexibility, and belonging as vital to maintaining employee engagement, productivity, and satisfaction. Data from McKinsey & Company confirms this. Companies resolving significant drivers of disengagement, including an unsafe environment and a lack of career advancement and workplace flexibility, can annually save up to $56 million.R.W. Holleman, head of enterprise sales at Rain, led the thought leadership spotlightResolving several major drivers of disengagement supports retention, reduces absenteeism, and boosts productivity. Companies then experience an increase in revenue.A Positive and Supportive CultureThe same study by McKinsey & Company showed that employee disengagement exhibited by workers with lower well-being can cost a median-size company between $228-355 million a year in lost productivity. In 5 years, that adds up to about $1.1 billion in lost value.It underscores how HR executives now occupy a unique position. They can be more influential to companies achieving sustainable financial success through leveraging comprehensive benefits and programs that support employee well-being. Going beyond the scope of traditional HR work is to pioneer the cultivation of positive and supportive modern-day workplace environments conducive to success for employers and employees.One way to foster a positive culture is to consider more inclusive benefits that better support employees’ overall well-being. Inclusive benefits empower workers, contribute significant value to their lives inside and outside the workplace, and help them thrive.For example, Rain gives employees instant access to 50% of their earned wages, providing financial flexibility. This benefit eases the stress of immediate financial burden, helping employees focus more on their careers. The program is also a win for employers because of its simple process: companies who access Rain’s program complete an EWA adjustment file and withhold the accessed wages from employees’ checks.“What makes that powerful? What I’m talking about is not technology or automation, right? It’s about meeting the human need for stability and security,” he said. By authentically addressing employees’ concerns and providing relevant solutions, employees feel more valued, optimistic, engaged, and committed to performing at their best.Other benefits like inclusive healthcare coverage, care benefits, wellness programs, skill development, work projects, and continuing education improve employee well-being and strengthen positive connections between employers and employees. “By recognizing the importance of the human element and giving employees the support they need, you’re not only driving engagement, you’re driving revenue,” he said.Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, Rain, for sponsoring this thought leadership spotlight.Stephanie Reed is a freelance news, marketing, and content writer. Much of her work features small business owners throughout diverse industries. She is passionate about promoting small, ethical, and eco-conscious businesses

Stephanie Reed | November 26, 2024