How Behavioral Science and ‘Nudge Theory’ Can Make a Difference in Gender Equality

BY Jenic Mantashian | November 05, 2019

Since humans are creatures of habit and tradition, they’ll tend to keep doing what they’re doing until something motivates them to change. Individuals may change their behavior for reasons particular to them, but what if leaders in business or government want to solve problems by encouraging change across a whole group of people? The thriving field of behavioral science has produced a wealth of insights in how to “nudge” people with gentle pushes that can add up to a big impact. Behavioral-science firm the BVA Nudge Unit is a global consultancy that helps clients ranging from Air France to the World Wildlife Fund to create sustainable change, both inside and outside their organizations. In an interview with From Day One, we asked Jenic Mantashian, Executive Vice President of the BVA Nudge Unit USA, about her company’s work in the field. Excerpts:

From Day One: Your organization recently helped the U.N. to engage 1 billion men in the cause of gender equality using behavioral science. That's a lot of people to sway. To start with, can you tell us about behavioral science as a field and give us some examples of its insights and tools?

Mantashian: Behavioral science is a field of study that brings together several disciplines, among them cognitive science, social psychology and behavioral economics.  In very simple terms, behavioral science seeks to understand the true drivers of human behavior.

As a consulting practice it’s a relatively new field, but has really taken off.  There have been several Nobel Prizes awarded to people for their work in behavioral science, as more and more people see its value for solving problems. Specifically, as a practice, it uncovers the cognitive biases, emotional and social influences, and the impact of context on our behavior. With those insights, we can pursue informed strategies to resolve what are otherwise intractable problems.

Some of the most well-known areas where applied behavioral science has emerged as a practice was in consumer finance and global health. Specifically, through the application of nudges, individuals were successfully encouraged to save more money for retirement and to vaccinate their children, respectively.

How do you define "nudge," as you deploy it among a particular group?

I should mention that the term “nudge” was coined by two leaders in this field, Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein.   In fact, they wrote the book on it–Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness.

The way I explain a nudge to people is that it is a small discrete intervention that is inspired by insights uncovered through our understanding of human behavior. It guides beneficial behaviors in such a way whereby choice is not limited, so people don’t feel forced.  Nudges can be carried out through changes to a physical space, by communicating in an intentional way, or simply by including behavioral strategies within any interaction with a group or individual.  For example, you can nudge employee behaviors in a meeting simply by being very deliberate about the name of the meeting room or the title of your meeting–in effect, priming the participants.

Jenic Mantashian is Executive Vice President of the BVA Nudge Unit USA

What is HeForShe, the movement you supported for the U.S., and what are some of the behaviors it seeks to address?

HeForShe is a solidarity campaign initiated by the U.N. for the global advancement of gender equality.  The movement invites men specifically, and people of all gender identifications, to stand in solidarity with women to create a brave, visible, and united force for gender equality.

From a behavioral perspective, as a first step, HeForShe “pre-engages” with men by gaining their commitment. They’re persuaded to sign up to be part of the movement on HeForShe.org. As a second step, HeForShe encourages those registered to take action in favor of gender equality within their own communities.

Naturally the specific behaviors are quite broad and varied, since each country and context is so different. The subjects of the nudges could range from heads of state, who have the ability to change laws related to pay equality, all the way to university students, who have the ability to foster a campus environment where women are safe from sexual assault.

Why is there a need to deploy behavioral science to influence these ingrained behaviors, rather than more traditional methods like public-service advertising?

I would start off by saying that giving people information is essential. Information helps establish an intent. Without an intent to act a certain way, it’s hard to make it happen.

With that said, time and again we have seen that information is simply not enough to change behavior. For example, we know that eating sugar and processed foods on a regular basis can lead to diabetes. We know that smoking cigarettes can lead to cancer.  We know that driving and texting can lead to fatal accidents. There is so much information out there on these topics, but millions of people still engage in these deadly behaviors.

What behavioral science and nudges allow us to do is complement the information we receive, so we can take a more comprehensive approach. For example, next time I have a craving for sweets, if I made changes to my kitchen environment that nudged me away from the cookies and nudged me towards the fruit, it will support me better with my intent to eat healthier.

Can you explain the use of commitment as a step toward change, and why it proves effective?’

We know from many experiments in our field that when someone commits to a future behavior, they are more likely to do it. For example, in one experiment, hotel guests were asked for a pre-commitment to reuse towels to support eco-friendly behavior at the hotel, and by simply having people check a box, there was a 25% average increase in the reuse of towels. It is believed by some that engaging in the commitment dissolves any cognitive dissonance that results from not following through on the committed action. And since humans look for ways to avoid discomfort, we are more likely to follow through with the action to avoid the guilt or conflict that can arise.

In a recent article, you identified many "drivers of influence." Could you offer a couple of prime examples?

Sure. At the BVA Nudge Unit, we created a tool that we coined the 21 Drivers of Influence.  The tool isolates 21 of the most powerful heuristic-based levers, from more than 200 that have been identified in the field, that can be used to amplify the effectiveness of specific activations. In other words, they serve as behavioral science-based inspirations that drive our ideation process when we design strategies and nudges to change behavior.

Commitment is one of those drivers. Another popular one is “Social Norms,” where we exploit the insight that people want to feel a sense of belonging and thus will be more likely to act in a way that’s like the rest of the group. If you look at Amazon, they use this driver very well, by showing you the popularity of a product, along with its ratings and endorsements by others. Another one is “Easiness,” which is the understanding that we are more likely to do something if it’s undemanding. That’s what Amazon was thinking in designing their “one click” check-out option.

You also talk about "stairs of change." Could you describe the process?

At the BVA Nudge Unit we have a proprietary behavioral framework that’s a step-wise process that inspires the development of behavioral science strategies and nudges. The best way to think about our Stairs of Change is to imagine you are climbing up four stories of a building, where each of the four stories represents an important stage. As you ascend to the top, you get closer to achieving your end goal.  However, if any of the steps are skipped haphazardly, you risk the collapse of your effort.

In other words, we break down the steps to the behavior into four areas and work on each of them. At the step “Preparing the Field,” we think about how to awaken the attention of our target, such as finding the right time, place and messenger. We take this through to “Reinforce the Behavior,” where we think about things like providing reassurance through feedback, recognizing the behavior through rewards, and activating social diffusion.

What kinds of results are you seeing from such programs, for example your work with the HeForShe movement?

The results have been very positive. Our primary focus with the U.N. was to nudge the commitment process, getting men to commit to the movement. Shortly after our interventions were launched, using analytics from HeForShe.org, it was determined that commitments jumped from 2% to 25% conversions among website visitors.

We’re also now working with HeForShe Champion corporations on the application of nudge within their organizations. Among other steps, they’re optimizing recruitment and hiring practices through the use of our frameworks in order to ensure gender-balanced workforces in specific sectors, along with achieving a more diverse workforce overall. We are in the testing phase and hope to share the good results soon.

What are some other examples from behavioral science in fostering diversity and gender equality, particularly in the corporate sector?

There are a lot of published examples out there and a good resource to access many of them can be found in our book called Nudge Management. Nudges can be put in place to encourage D&I at all stages of the employee experience. Let me give you some examples:

When hiring: In advertisements, only list requirements that are key to the position. Research has shown that there are trends in the way specific groups respond to job advertisements. For instance, women tend to apply only when they feel they meet 100% of the required capabilities on a job advertisement, while men are likely to apply when they meet only 60%of those qualifications.

To debias annual reviews: At a mid-size U.S. tech company, the annual-review process involved managers discussing staff performance. Comments were largely about employees’ personalities rather than their actual work, and included various stereotypes. A study showed that 14% women were criticized for being too aggressive, 8% of men were criticized for being “too soft.”  The company initiated an employee scorecard which focused on the work output and its impact on the business and not the individual. The result? A year after rolling out new scorecard, none of the women were criticized for being too aggressive, and less than 1% of men were criticized for being “too soft.”

To increase diversity in global job assignments: An international assignment is often seen as a crucial step in a successful career in large organizations. But not many women declare themselves open to international mobility. In a global company, simply rephrasing the question on an employee-development questionnaire–from “are you internationally mobile?” to “would you consider an international assignment sometime in the future?”—led to a 25% increase the number of women declaring they were mobile, and thus candidates for further management development.

That said, it’s important to note that these methods don’t necessarily work in every situation. Contexts change how people behave. That’s why ad-hoc solutions are generally recommended.

Looking ahead, what other problems are you aiming to address by wielding behavioral science?

Basically, any problems that exist where there are humans involved, we want to be there to support positive change. On the Nudge Management side, when nudging within organizations, this can range from encouraging entrepreneurial behavior among sales reps and the adoption of new sales automation platforms, to promoting compliance with safety rules and regulations, to adopting behavior that supports communication or innovation.    More broadly, we also are working on using behavioral science to improve customer experience, to adopt sustainable behavior, and promote the quality of life and standard of living in cities.

Editor’s Note: BVA Nudge Unit USA is a sponsor of From Day One. The author of this article can be reached at jenic.mantashian@bvanudgeunit.com  


RELATED STORIES

Benefits Recap & Forecast: Navigating Alternative Health Plan Choices in 2025

On a summer day in 2024, Matt Cook, chief commercial officer of Firefly Health, suddenly felt some pain in his stomach. He reached out to his Firefly care team and scheduled a 15 minute appointment with a nurse practitioner who ordered him to get a CT scan. The results showed Cook had appendicitis and the next day he was scheduled for a surgery. All of this happened within 72 hours of care.Firefly Health is a virtual-first healthcare company that offers an alternative health plan that aims to make it easier for people to get the care they need. During a From Day One webinar, journalist Jenny Sucov spoke with Cook and Erik Sossa, independent advisor and consultant to Firefly and former Vice President of Global Benefits and Wellness at PepsiCo about health plan trends and challenges employers face with the changing landscape for benefits.The Shortfalls of Typical Healthcare BenefitsWhile Sossa was working with PepsiCo., he felt that employers were leaving employees to manage their benefits on their own. “They had to deal with changes in annual enrollment, finding an in network provider, prior authorization and an explanation of benefits,” he said.Despite the value of healthcare benefits, corporations are taking away from the positive employee experience while they themselves are struggling with the cost of providing care for their workers. “Employees oftentimes are facing the brunt of some of those tough decisions in the form of maybe a more restricted plan,” said Cook. “Affordability is such an issue for both the employee and employers themselves.”Coming from the corporate side, Sossa acknowledges that companies struggle with cost sharing and sometimes burden employees with having to educate themselves on healthcare plans while they may not have the time to learn the ins and outs of health insurance.“For an employee who doesn’t navigate healthcare for a living, they serve our companies for a living, that’s a tremendous burden on them to try to navigate through this,” said Sossa. “That’s part of the dynamic and one of the things I’m very excited about with companies like Firefly that are trying to really change that paradigm.”Matt Cook, the chief commercial officer of Firefly Health, spoke during the webinar (company photo)Cook said that one group that launched Firefly’s health plan alongside traditional plans told them that Firefly was “the first plan they ever offered where frontline workers and executives alike chose the same plan.” The concept of healthcare affordability is not just with money, but also time. For busy workers, healthcare is only useful when it can be accessible according to the member’s schedule.What is Alternative Healthcare?Alternative health care is an alternative to “historical medical plans that have been delivered in this country across a consolidated set of health plans that are out there today,” said Cook.Firefly is trying to “rethink” the medical plan experience by taking off the burden that has been placed on employees. Sossa views it as the “next evolution” of healthcare. “It’s an alternative to a broken system but hopefully that alternative becomes more and more of the status quo as we rethink the way healthcare needs to be delivered in this country,” Cook said.The new generation of healthcare that Sossa envisions is one that is affordable, accountable, productive and healthy. Firefly is using industry wide data sets on wellness, prescription drugs and labs to understand the gaps that need to be filled in healthcare.Firefly’s model allows patients to quickly schedule a 15 minute visit and continue the engagement in between visits. The company found that there were more longitudinal engagements with its members that were dealing with chronic conditions, some of which they were seeing two dozen to 100 times a year. In a primary care system, they might be visiting their doctor once a year, said Cook.The company offers both virtual and in person care through local partnerships. Firefly uses a care model that ensures members are consistently met with the same team throughout their journey.Pitching New Programs to StakeholdersChanges in new programs, like healthcare, can be exciting but it has to be approved by company stakeholders in order to be implemented. Sossa said when something new is being pitched, you have to have a “clear understanding of your audience and speak their language.”When talking to the CFO, understand the marketing, investments and advertising aspects. When discussing with human resources, touch on the represented population, labor landscape and contracts. Sossa says stakeholders will be more receptive to ideas that are half-baked, ones that require some brainstorming.“Bring them the idea at a 30% mark, where you have the ability to sonar ping with them, get their influence and get their reaction. But if you have a chance to sonar ping your ideas as you go through, that makes them part of developing the solution, and they are much more receptive to that,” Sossa added.He encourages corporate leaders to “resist the gravitational forces of short term thinking” and consider how something that will be sustainable and will solve issues takes time. Sossa advises his clients to think of themselves as moving into the first year of a three year strategy. “Aim a little higher in your steering,” he said.The Future of HealthcareAlternative healthcare is at an inflection point, but it is still a slow progressing industry as they introduce the concept to the corporate world, says Sossa. Cook added that the inflection comes at a time where provider shortages are only getting worse.“Ultimately, the average person is going to be looking for that accessible, high quality care and I think that moment is coming. We need to bring great quality care to our people, not leave it to them to go and figure out where to find it,” said Cook.More competitors are entering the alternative health care industry and the adoption of it is going to increase in 2025, predicts Sossa. Especially with growing frustrations on the traditional healthcare models and lack of progression to meet members’ needs.Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, Firefly Health, for sponsoring this webinar. Jennifer Yoshikoshi is a local news and education reporter based in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Jennifer Yoshikoshi | January 27, 2025

Is It Time to Break Up With Your HR Tech?

Looking into new technology always takes time to research and adopt, but organizations should not put it off simply because it’s a lot of work. “There is constant evolution of technology,” said JJ Carpenter, senior account executive at Rippling, a platform designed to streamline HR, IT, and financial processes. “There are different systems out there today that maybe didn’t fit your bill a year ago.”Carpenter spoke about HR tech at From Day One’s November virtual, offering suggestions on how to approach new tech that could potentially make a big impact on how a company functions.Could it be time to shop around for new tech? HR technology should be evaluated regularly—typically every two to three years, though some companies do so annually, Carpenter says—to determine if it still meets organizational needs. Key triggers for evaluation include disconnected or inefficient systems, workarounds or manual data entry, duplicate processes, and the use of multiple unintegrated systems.Rather than sticking with outdated methods, organizations should stay informed about new solutions that may better fit their needs. Technology evolves, and what wasn’t a good fit before might be now. Regularly exploring options ensures HR systems remain effective and efficient. He spoke on what to look for in HR tech. Excerpts:Manual vs. AutomationOne of the most critical considerations is automation, as many HR tasks are still manual, creating inefficiencies and an increased administrative burden. Carpenter suggests evaluating HR tech with these questions: Are processes still paper-based? Do approvals require physical sign-offs? Is duplicate data entry a recurring issue? Can workflows be automated to reduce human intervention?A robust HR tech solution should provide automation that improves efficiency, reduces errors, and maintains an audit trail for tracking and reporting. “You don’t want employees to fall between the cracks,” Carpenter added. “Otherwise, they’ll get online and start looking at other companies. You want to try to retain those employees, that talent.”Organizations should evaluate whether their current system requires excessive manual input and whether automation can streamline transitions, promotions, and other workforce changes. Company BackgroundUnderstanding the history, structure, and direction of an HR tech provider is essential. In addition to evaluating present-day features, it’s important to consider the long-term partnership potential. Key questions to ask include: Is the system natively built, or is it a collection of acquired tools? Do different modules integrate seamlessly, or are they patched together? How often does the provider update and improve its technology? What does the provider’s roadmap look like for the future? JJ Carpenter a senior account executive at Rippling led the thought leadership spotlight (company photo)A well-integrated system helps prevent hidden inefficiencies that could impact long-term usability. Forward-thinking organizations should also assess the provider’s approach to AI development, security, and legal frameworks, including: Are AI-driven features being developed, and how will they impact HR teams? What data security measures are in place for AI functionalities? How does the provider handle contracts, including annual increases and master service agreements (MSAs)?Assessing these factors upfront ensures alignment between the HR tech provider and an organization’s strategic goals, Carpenter says.User-Friendly InterfaceEase of use is a major factor in the success of any HR tech platform. If employees and HR teams struggle to navigate the system, adoption rates will suffer. “Once we have a tool, will people actually use it? The worst thing you can do is invest in a tool you think solves a problem, only to find it creates a whole new one.”A user-friendly system reduces frustration, accelerates onboarding, and ensures employees and administrators can leverage its full capabilities without excessive training. Carpenter suggested not just asking if a function exists—ask the provider to demonstrate it.Test the TechBefore committing to an HR tech solution, it’s important to test it firsthand. Carpenter urged companies to request a sandbox environment to explore features, a demo showcasing real-world scenarios, and opportunities for HR teams to interact with the platform before implementation.“It’s got to be something that’s going to take away your burden, or at least help mitigate it,” he said.Reporting CapabilitiesData-driven decision-making is a cornerstone of effective HR management, and a strong HR tech solution should provide robust reporting capabilities, including customizable reports on workforce trends, compliance tracking for various regulations, easy export options for integration with analytics tools like Tableau or Power BI, and visibility into key HR metrics across multiple locations and entities.Organizations should ensure their HR tech allows them to track performance, generate insights, and make strategic decisions efficiently. “You want to focus on reducing your admin time and increasing your strategy, which boosts productivity,” Carpenter said.Customer Service & Response TimeReliable customer support is crucial when issues arise, as employee hours are valuable, and HR tech should build efficiency—not create more work while users sit on hold. When evaluating HR tech providers, consider Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for response times, Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) scores and user reviews, the availability of self-service options, and dedicated support models, such as pod-based support teams.A provider with strong customer support ensures that technical issues and inquiries are addressed promptly, minimizing disruptions to HR operations.Return on Investment & Management Buy-in“Sometimes other parties need to be involved more than you initially expect. Typically, you might start with an HR evaluation and realize IT needs to be part of the discussion, especially for security concerns,” Carpenter said.Look for tools that provide documentation, ISO and SOC certifications, and transparency around their security measures. These aspects are critical when presenting to leadership or a board.A strong business case for new HR tech should include time savings, as manual tasks consume valuable hours that translate into salary costs; administrative costs, since excessive administrative work reduces strategic focus and profitability; and long-term efficiency, as reducing manual work improves overall productivity and operational effectiveness.To build a persuasive case, outline the problem, the cost of inaction, and the benefits of the new solution. Decision-makers will weigh factors such as implementation time, cost, ROI, and associated risks.Effective evaluation involves a phased approach, system consolidation, and change management to ensure a smooth transition. Testing before implementation is crucial to preventing unforeseen challenges. In the end, making a well-informed decision based on both current and future needs will set an organization up for long-term success. “There is a cost to change,” Carpenter told attendees, “but there’s also a reward if you make the right decision.”Investing in the right solution can drive efficiency, improve compliance, and enhance the employee experience. By focusing on automation, company background, usability, testing, reporting, support, and ROI, organizations can make a smarter, more strategic decision that scales with growth.Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, Rippling, for sponsoring this thought leadership spotlight. Carrie Snider is a Phoenix-based journalist and marketing copywriter.

Carrie Snider | January 24, 2025

The Future of Employee Experience: Leveraging Technology To Drive Engagement

Organizations that lack a technology strategy risk falling behind in addressing employee engagement—one of the most pressing challenges businesses face today. Research from leading firms like Gartner, Gallup, and Forrester reveals alarming trends: 60% of employees report burnout, 80% experience loneliness, and 70% feel disengaged. These factors contribute to a 50% increase in quiet quitting.“We need to drive engagement. We need tools that allow us to recognize each other and foster leadership transparency,” said Jaime McMahon, chief digital officer at LineZero. McMahon spoke during a thought leadership spotlight at From Day One’s December virtual conference.McMahon pointed out four priorities for HR professionals moving into 2025 including:Transforming HR through technology and strategic integrationCreating a future ready workforceFostering a culture of innovation and adaptabilityEnhancing employee experience and engagementHR professionals are prioritizing talent retention, according to a survey by Fuel50. Organizations are increasingly recognizing employees as vital assets to their business rather than replaceable workers. However, the challenge lies in effectively retaining talent. According to Fuel50, only 20% of organizations have systems in place to track employees’ skills and abilities.Creating the framework for data and AI gives organizations the ability to track the ROI of engagement initiatives, detect trends, and make changes as needed faster. “How do we make sure and get access to this type of information so that we can make our workforce effective? At the end of the day, it begins and ends with the data” said McMahon.Driving Change With Data and AIJaime McMahon the chief digital officer at LineZero led the conversation (company photo)Taking advantage of new technologies like AI is smart for business. AI is rearranging old operational habits. The capabilities offer ways for a customized employee onboarding experience, as well as automating routine HR duties. It’s not just about AI, though, says McMahon.Integrating a digital workplace becomes a centerpiece for efficient communication, feedback, and document management.  Employees stay informed on important company business, making them feel included, which in turn creates more engagement. Plus, it enables proactive decisions with real-time analytics.Organizations should avoid focusing solely on building a digital workplace and instead aim to create a comprehensive digital hub. This hub integrates five key components: communications, which facilitate seamless information sharing; engagement, which fosters connection and collaboration; a digital workplace, which provides the tools and infrastructure employees need to work efficiently; analytics and insights, which drive data-informed decision-making; and AI assistance, which enhances productivity and support through intelligent automation.“When I think about what’s going to make an impact today, these all make a dramatic impact,” he said. Companies who are not implementing these digital concepts will likely fall behind their competitors. Looking into the new year, companies who seek to stay ahead must invest in digital hubs, embrace AI, and make employee experience the focal point of their business strategy.Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, LineZero, for sponsoring this thought leadership spotlight.Mary Jones is a freelance writer out of Ohio. Her work is featured in several publications including The Dallas Express, NDash, and The Daily Advocate.

Mary Jones | January 10, 2025